Bug 994852
Summary: | 32 bit installer should try to detect and warn about 64 bit (UEFI) system | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Matthew Cline <matt> |
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Anaconda Maintenance Team <anaconda-maint-list> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 20 | CC: | anaconda-maint-list, dshea, g.kaviyarasu, jonathan, mkolman, sbueno, vanmeeuwen+fedora |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-03-13 21:43:11 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Matthew Cline
2013-08-08 06:38:05 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 20 development cycle. Changing version to '20'. More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora20 Installing a 32-bit OS on a 64-bit system is a valid use case. If the system is able to boot from the 32-bit installation media, which does not include an EFI bootloader, then it's likely that the system will be able to boot in BIOS mode from the hard drive post-install. More importantly, there is no way for anaconda to know if the system would not be able to boot in such a case. This is a BIOS configuration issue. |