Bug 99534

Summary:	Bugzilla has no entry for severn
Product:	[Community] Bugzilla	Reporter:	Zenon Panoussis <redhatbugs>
Component:	Bugzilla General	Assignee:	Bill Peck <bpeck>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	2.8	CC:	tchung
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2003-07-21 18:47:46 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Zenon Panoussis 2003-07-21 18:28:11 UTC

Description of problem:

Despite the fact that severn (rhl 9.0.93) has been released for public testing,
bugzilla has no category for the bug reports. There is therefore a good risk
that bug reports will be mislabeled, making searching more difficult.

Comment 1 David Lawrence 2003-07-21 18:47:46 UTC

Please use 'Red Hat Linux Beta' as the product and 'beta1' as the version when
reporting bugs regarding the 'Severn' release.

Comment 2 Thomas Chung 2003-08-01 21:38:14 UTC

>----- Additional Comment #1 From David Lawrence on 2003-07-21 14:47 -------
>
>Please use 'Red Hat Linux Beta' as the product and 'beta1' as the version when
>reporting bugs regarding the 'Severn' release.

Hello David,

I don't think it's a good idea to use "beta1" to search for SEVERN related issues.
It brings all the issues all the way back from Red Hat Linux 7 betas.
If you choose "Red Hat Public Beta" you can see "fisher, limbo, null, pensacola,
phoebe, roswell, skipjack, wolvern"
Why not add "severn" in that category?
Also why not combine "Red Hat Linux Beta" and "Red Hat Public Beta"?

Thank you
Thomas