Bug 995484
Summary: | sm-notify: "-v hostname" doesn't work when IPV6_SUPPORT is enabled | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Ramandeep Arora <raarora> | |
Component: | nfs-utils | Assignee: | Steve Dickson <steved> | |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | JianHong Yin <jiyin> | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | ||
Priority: | unspecified | |||
Version: | 6.4 | CC: | fs-qe, jiali, jiyin, sbhat, steved | |
Target Milestone: | rc | Flags: | jiyin:
needinfo-
|
|
Target Release: | --- | |||
Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
OS: | Linux | |||
Whiteboard: | ||||
Fixed In Version: | nfs-utils-1.2.3-38.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
Clone Of: | ||||
: | 1127554 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-11-21 23:38:58 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Embargoed: | ||||
Bug Depends On: | ||||
Bug Blocks: | 1127554, 1127560, 1172231 |
Description
Ramandeep Arora
2013-08-09 14:02:36 UTC
commit 37add3662de0339a75d3bed86a4235fc7efaf18d Author: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever> Date: Fri Apr 19 13:13:57 2013 -0400 sm-notify: "-v hostname" doesn't work when IPV6_SUPPORT is enabled > sm-notify: "-v hostname" doesn't work when IPV6_SUPPORT is enabled
Hi steved,
I can not reproduce this issue.
could you tell me how to enable the "IPV6_SUPPORT",
and how to config the client and server point for reproduce?
thanks.
Hi steve, pls check the result? Verify: In my test environment, dhcp12-225.nay.redhat.com is non-formal host-name, but sm-notify works well. [root@hp-xw4600-01 statd]# sm-notify -v hp-xw4600-01.rhts.eng.nay.redhat.com -d -f sm-notify: Version 1.2.3 starting sm-notify: Canonical name for my_name 'hp-xw4600-01.rhts.eng.nay.redhat.com': hp-xw4600-01.rhts.eng.nay.redhat.com sm-notify: Retired record for mon_name dhcp12-225.nay.redhat.com sm-notify: Added host dhcp12-225.nay.redhat.com to notify list sm-notify: Effective UID, GID: 29, 29 sm-notify: getaddrinfo(3): Name or service not known sm-notify: DNS resolution of dhcp12-225.nay.redhat.com failed; retrying later sm-notify: Host dhcp12-225.nay.redhat.com due in 2 seconds sm-notify: getaddrinfo(3): Name or service not known sm-notify: DNS resolution of dhcp12-225.nay.redhat.com failed; retrying later sm-notify: Host dhcp12-225.nay.redhat.com due in 4 seconds sm-notify: getaddrinfo(3): Name or service not known reproduce: [root@hp-xw4600-01 statd]# sm-notify -v hp-xw4600-01.rhts.eng.nay.redhat.com -d -f sm-notify: Version 1.2.3 starting sm-notify: Retired record for mon_name dhcp12-225.nay.redhat.com sm-notify: Added host dhcp12-225.nay.redhat.com to notify list sm-notify: Invalid bind address or port for RPC socket: No address associated with hostname (In reply to Jian Li from comment #7) > Hi steve, pls check the result? > > Verify: > In my test environment, dhcp12-225.nay.redhat.com is non-formal host-name, > but sm-notify works well. > > [root@hp-xw4600-01 statd]# sm-notify -v hp-xw4600-01.rhts.eng.nay.redhat.com > -d -f > sm-notify: Version 1.2.3 starting > sm-notify: Canonical name for my_name > 'hp-xw4600-01.rhts.eng.nay.redhat.com': hp-xw4600-01.rhts.eng.nay.redhat.com > sm-notify: Retired record for mon_name dhcp12-225.nay.redhat.com > sm-notify: Added host dhcp12-225.nay.redhat.com to notify list > sm-notify: Effective UID, GID: 29, 29 > sm-notify: getaddrinfo(3): Name or service not known > sm-notify: DNS resolution of dhcp12-225.nay.redhat.com failed; retrying later > sm-notify: Host dhcp12-225.nay.redhat.com due in 2 seconds > sm-notify: getaddrinfo(3): Name or service not known > sm-notify: DNS resolution of dhcp12-225.nay.redhat.com failed; retrying later > sm-notify: Host dhcp12-225.nay.redhat.com due in 4 seconds > sm-notify: getaddrinfo(3): Name or service not known > > > reproduce: > > [root@hp-xw4600-01 statd]# sm-notify -v hp-xw4600-01.rhts.eng.nay.redhat.com > -d -f > sm-notify: Version 1.2.3 starting > sm-notify: Retired record for mon_name dhcp12-225.nay.redhat.com > sm-notify: Added host dhcp12-225.nay.redhat.com to notify list > sm-notify: Invalid bind address or port for RPC socket: No address > associated with hostname It looks like your having DNS problems.... What is the output of host dhcp12-225.nay.redhat.com? (In reply to Steve Dickson from comment #8) > It looks like your having DNS problems.... What is the output of > host dhcp12-225.nay.redhat.com? Yes, DNS dhcp12-225.nay.redhat.com have problem, I just want to check whether sm-notify can work. I retest with another system. [root@dhcp-13-188 statd]# sm-notify -v dhcp-13-188.nay.redhat.com -d -f sm-notify: Version 1.2.3 starting sm-notify: Canonical name for my_name 'dhcp-13-188.nay.redhat.com': dhcp-13-188.nay.redhat.com sm-notify: Retired record for mon_name hp-xw4600-01.rhts.eng.nay.redhat.com sm-notify: Added host hp-xw4600-01.rhts.eng.nay.redhat.com to notify list sm-notify: Effective UID, GID: 29, 29 sm-notify: Sending PMAP_GETPORT for 100024, 1, udp sm-notify: Host hp-xw4600-01.rhts.eng.nay.redhat.com due in 2 seconds sm-notify: Received packet... sm-notify: Received PMAP_GETPORT result: 34629 sm-notify: Sending SM_NOTIFY for dhcp-13-188.nay.redhat.com sm-notify: Host hp-xw4600-01.rhts.eng.nay.redhat.com due in 4 seconds sm-notify: Received packet... sm-notify: Sending SM_NOTIFY for dhcp-13-188.nay.redhat.com sm-notify: Host hp-xw4600-01.rhts.eng.nay.redhat.com due in 8 seconds sm-notify: Received packet... sm-notify: Host hp-xw4600-01.rhts.eng.nay.redhat.com notified successfully sm-notify: Removing hp-xw4600-01.rhts.eng.nay.redhat.com (10.66.86.85, dhcp-13-188) from notify list [root@dhcp-13-188 statd]# echo $? 0 verified by /CoreOS/nfs-utils/commands/utils/sm-notify https://beaker.engineering.redhat.com/jobs/491203 https://beaker.engineering.redhat.com/jobs/491232 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1714.html *** Bug 1127554 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Removing from the 68FileAndStorageRPL. |