Bug 995894

Summary: gnubg-1.02.000 dependency and build cleanup needed (w/patch)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Michael Petch <mpetch>
Component: gnubgAssignee: Gwyn Ciesla <gwync>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: gwync, mpetch
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-08-12 18:32:36 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
gnubg.spec patch to resolve deficiencies in this bug report none

Description Michael Petch 2013-08-11 22:08:19 UTC
Created attachment 785488 [details]
gnubg.spec patch to resolve deficiencies in this bug report

Description of problem:
- The new 1.02.000 is lacking sound, as upstream developers deprecated esound in favour of libcanberra. 
- Player database support dependencies were missing (mysql-python and sqlite). 
- Remove unused sound dependencies and libxml2. 
- Long seed support is missing, add gmp dependency.
- Some configure options are no longer available (functionality was deprecated).
- The license for GNUBG is now GPLv3. 
- The documentation directory needs cleanup. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gnubg-1.02.000-1.fc20 all architectures

See attachment for gnubg.spec patch that deals with most of these issues.

Comment 1 Michael Petch 2013-08-11 22:31:18 UTC
I noticed that the patch was one that I hadn't increased the "Release:" tag to reflect "2%{?dist)" as the patch is still set to 1

Comment 2 Gwyn Ciesla 2013-08-12 18:32:36 UTC
I bumped the release, but it not bump the Epoch, as there's no reason to do so.  Thanks for your work on this!  I also restored the font unbundling bits.

Comment 3 Gwyn Ciesla 2013-08-12 18:33:23 UTC
Ignore the last comment, it was on the wrong BZ. :)