Bug 996395
Summary: | gcc-4.8.1-5.fc20 is FTBFS | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Dan Horák <dan> |
Component: | binutils | Assignee: | Nick Clifton <nickc> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | urgent | ||
Version: | 20 | CC: | jakub, law, nickc |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | s390x | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | binutils-2.23.88.0.1-12.fc20 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-09-18 10:22:50 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 467765 |
Description
Dan Horák
2013-08-13 06:29:01 UTC
Nick, please see Jakub's response on IRC <jakub> dhorak: sounds like a binutils issue <jakub> dhorak: unlike el7 or f19, the f20 binutils aren't based on hjl's releases and thus are significantly older than what f19 or el7 has <jakub> dhorak: you need to bug binutils maintainers to backport the needed changes power8 support is missing in f20 too I think, don't know what is the AVX 3.1 state. Jakub, should I expect any problem when binutils-2.23.52.0.1-10.fc20 will be used to build gcc? Older, but from the Linux branch. binutils-2.23.88.0.1-12.fc20 should fix this. Cheers Nick Just to clarify, F20 isn't "significantly older", and we made a conscious decision to get away from the HJ releases and instead base Fedora (and ultimately RHEL) on the upstream binutils releases. We expected some problems from this transition, particularly on the lesser tested platforms. It looks like Nick already took care of this instance. Please feel free to contact either of us if there are additional issues. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 20 development cycle. Changing version to '20'. More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora20 |