Bug 996881

Summary: deploy.xml is not created automaticaly when using BPEL implementation for Component
Product: [JBoss] JBoss Fuse Service Works 6 Reporter: Jiri Sedlacek <jsedlace>
Component: ToolingAssignee: tcunning
Status: NEW --- QA Contact: Len DiMaggio <ldimaggi>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 6.0.0 GACC: atangrin, kconner, kejohnso, oskutka, rwagner, soa-p-jira
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: Enhancement
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Description Jiri Sedlacek 2013-08-14 04:39:55 EDT
If I add BPEL Component to switchyard project, Process.bpel file is created, but deploy.xml file is important for deployment too, and this file isn't created.

User has to create it separately by creating plain xml file. Moreover, deploy.xml, Process.bpel, switchyard.xml should be linked somehow, to let user set these files in confortable way. Now you have to know exactly which namespaces and names to fill there and if you change it in switchyard.xml, propagation to other files has to be done manualy.
Comment 1 Rob Cernich 2013-08-14 11:14:35 EDT
There is an outstanding enhancement request in JIRA to remove the requirement for deploy.xml altogether.

In addition to that, the issue with synchronizing switchyard.xml content with other artifacts in the project, in my opinion, falls under the broader scope of refactoring and is not solely limited to bpel.  It applies to all the implementation types.

That said, I don't think refactoring support will be available in the 6.0 timeframe.  Improved validation (for sure), and possibly "quick fix" support (hopefully) are probably as far as we'll get for 6.0.  In any case, I think we need to split this issue into multiple issues:
1. deploy.xml
2. refactoring
3. validation
Comment 3 Rob Cernich 2013-08-23 13:57:28 EDT
This is an enhancement request and will not make it in the 6.0 timeframe.
Comment 4 Rob Cernich 2014-10-21 15:37:12 EDT
I don't think this is going to make it into FSW 6.1
Comment 5 Len DiMaggio 2015-02-17 12:38:43 EST
Nacking this bugzilla - this is an EAP issue and FSW 6.2 will not embed EAP.
Comment 6 Ken Johnson 2015-03-12 14:53:56 EDT
This is low priority but is there anything we can do (doc, sample file) to make this easier?
Comment 7 Len DiMaggio 2015-03-16 11:50:48 EDT
Nacked in error! This is not an EAP issue.
Comment 8 Len DiMaggio 2015-03-16 11:51:54 EDT
A documented sample file would be a good solution.