Bug 997188

Summary: lvm2app: lvm_list_pvs_free segmentation fault when system has no physical volumes
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Tony Asleson <tasleson>
Component: lvm2Assignee: Tony Asleson <tasleson>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Cluster QE <mspqa-list>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.5CC: agk, cmarthal, dwysocha, heinzm, jbrassow, msnitzer, prajnoha, prockai, thornber, zkabelac
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: lvm2-2.02.100-3.el6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
When lvm_list_pvs_free lvm2app library function was called on a system with no physical volumes, a segmentation fault occured because lvm2app code tried to free an internal structure that had already been freed before. This has been fixed and the segmentation fault does not occur anymore when calling lvm_list_pvs_free function.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-21 23:27:04 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Unit test which shows segmentation fault. none

Description Tony Asleson 2013-08-14 21:24:29 UTC
Created attachment 786709 [details]
Unit test which shows segmentation fault.

Description of problem:

If the system does not have any physcial volumes the call to lvm_list_pvs_free will cause a segmentation fault after a successful call to lvm_list_pvs.

How reproducible:
Every time

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Select a system that has no PVs
2. Compile and run the attached C program

Actual results:
Program crashes with segmentation fault.

Expected results:
No segmentation fault, program exit code == 0

Additional info:

Fixed in upstream:
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/lvm2-commits/2013-August/001105.html

Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2013-11-21 23:27:04 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1704.html