Bug 997206
| Summary: | [RFE] geo-replication to swift target | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Community] GlusterFS | Reporter: | Andrew Hatfield <ahatfiel> |
| Component: | geo-replication | Assignee: | bugs <bugs> |
| Status: | CLOSED EOL | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | mainline | CC: | avishwan, bugs, gluster-bugs, jdarcy, mmj |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2015-10-22 15:46:38 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Andrew Hatfield
2013-08-14 23:50:33 UTC
The goal of making geo-replication work over a secure connection is laudable, but why would we want to tie it to Swift? There are pretty good ways to do this in Python or C (our two implementation languages) so that it would be applicable to non-Swift deployments. Feature requests make most sense against the 'mainline' release, there is no ETA for an implementation and requests might get forgotten when filed against a particular version. because of the large number of bugs filed against mainline version\ is ambiguous and about to be removed as a choice. If you believe this is still a bug, please change the status back to NEW and choose the appropriate, applicable version for it. |