Bug 998459

Summary: Review Request: rubygem-paint - Terminal painter
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Miroslav Suchý <msuchy>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: jstribny, notting
Target Milestone: ---Flags: mtasaka: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: rubygem-paint-0.8.6-3.fc19 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-09-05 01:27:40 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 998915    

Description Miroslav Suchý 2013-08-19 11:21:58 UTC
Spec URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rubygem-paint/rubygem-paint.spec
SRPM URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rubygem-paint/rubygem-paint-0.8.6-2.fc19.src.rpm
Description:
Paint manages terminal colors and effects for you. It combines the strengths
of term-ansicolor, rainbow and other similar projects into a simple to use,
however still flexible terminal colorization gem with no core extensions by
default.

Fedora Account System Username: msuchy
Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5828832

Comment 1 Mamoru TASAKA 2013-08-25 07:33:31 UTC
Taking.
Taking. I will appreciate it if you would review one of my review requests (e.g. bug 912961 : note that bug 912961 depends on bug 912960  )

Comment 2 Mamoru TASAKA 2013-08-26 05:25:11 UTC
Some initial comments:

* MRI specfic Requires:
  - Does "BuildRequires: ruby >= 1.8.7" mean that BR really
    needs MRI ruby?

* Virtual (Build)Requires preferred
  - Please use rubygem(rspec) instead of rubygem-rspec.

? Perhaps unneeded commands
  - Please check if
    cp -pr spec/ ./%{gem_instdir}
    is really needed.

* Main documents
  - At least "LICENSE.txt" should be main package, because
    this contains license information
  - Also I recommend to move "README.rdoc" to main, because
    this is "README".
  - _I_ would also move CHANGELOG.rdoc to main.

* Unwanted documents
  - Files for test suite like spec/ should not be in
    binary rpm: (see "Do not ship test" at below)
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby?rd=Packaging/Ruby#Running_test_suites

  - Also "Rakefile" is something like "Makefile" in
    autotool-based packages and usually this is not needed
    in binary rpm.

? Duplicate review request
  - Please contact the submitter of bug 886871 .

Comment 3 Miroslav Suchý 2013-08-26 11:52:14 UTC
*** Bug 886871 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Miroslav Suchý 2013-08-26 13:23:59 UTC
> * MRI specfic Requires:
Not needed, I was specified in gemspec. And it seems that author just wanted to say ruby higher the 1.8. And since that is valid on all current Fedoras, plain
Requires: ruby(release) is enough.

> * Virtual (Build)Requires preferred
Fixed.


> ? Perhaps unneeded commands
It works without that as well. Hmm, why I added that? Could not recall. Removing.

> * Main documents
I moved LICENSE and README. I choosed to keep CHANGELOG in -doc.

> * Unwanted documents
Those test are not in main package (this is what Guideliness are saying).
They are presented in -doc subpackage (which does all other rubygems package as well). This is IMO good as test are in fact often good examples how to use that library. The same for Rakefile.

> Please contact the submitter of bug 886871.
Aha, did not noticed that. Jstribrny sits in the same cubicle as me, I will tell him as soon as hi appear in office. Closing bug 886871 as duplicate.

Comment 6 Mamoru TASAKA 2013-08-27 01:36:19 UTC
Is http://miroslav.suchy.cz/ alive?

Comment 7 Josef Stribny 2013-08-27 07:00:57 UTC
> Aha, did not noticed that.

Not a problem, continue with the packaging of this gem.

Josef

Comment 8 Mamoru TASAKA 2013-08-27 07:19:13 UTC
(In reply to Mamoru TASAKA from comment #6)
> Is http://miroslav.suchy.cz/ alive?
Now it seems alive.

Approving.
-----------------------------------------------------------
    This package (rubygem-paint) is APPROVED by mtasaka
------------------------------------------------------------

Comment 9 Miroslav Suchý 2013-08-27 07:47:25 UTC
Thanks.

Comment 10 Miroslav Suchý 2013-08-27 07:49:13 UTC
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: rubygem-paint
Short Description: Terminal painter
Owners: msuchy
Branches: f19 f20
InitialCC:

Comment 11 Gwyn Ciesla 2013-08-27 12:22:27 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2013-08-27 12:42:32 UTC
rubygem-paint-0.8.6-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-paint-0.8.6-3.fc19

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2013-08-27 23:25:37 UTC
rubygem-paint-0.8.6-3.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository.

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2013-09-05 01:27:40 UTC
rubygem-paint-0.8.6-3.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.