Bug 999662

Summary: splitting the sos report to modules - Swift
Product: [Community] RDO Reporter: lpeer <lpeer>
Component: openstack-swiftAssignee: Alan Pevec <apevec>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Shai Revivo <srevivo>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: unspecifiedCC: apevec, ayoung, chrisw, derekh, eglynn, fpercoco, iheim, jpeeler, markmc, ndipanov, rbryant, zaitcev
Target Milestone: Milestone3   
Target Release: Havana   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 999660 Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-04-16 22:40:16 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 999587    

Description lpeer 2013-08-21 19:40:58 UTC 
Description of problem:

Using component naming instead of a single product naming could help make the sos plugin easier to maintain.

Instead of having -
 https://github.com/sosreport/sosreport/blob/master/sos/plugins/openstack.py

We should have module per component: nova, neutron, heat, ceilometer, glance, etc, etc

Other relevant information can be found on the thread -
http://post-office.corp.redhat.com/archives/rh-openstack-dev/2013-August/msg00364.html

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

--- Additional comment from lpeer on 2013-08-21 15:27:46 EDT ---

please create openstack-swift.py
Comment 1 Flavio Percoco 2013-08-27 12:39:09 UTC 
Created PR https://github.com/sosreport/sosreport/pull/188
Comment 2 Flavio Percoco 2013-09-09 08:48:37 UTC 
Merged upstream
Comment 5 Alan Pevec (Fedora) 2015-04-16 22:40:16 UTC 
openstack plugins have been included into sos 3.2