Bug 999668
| Summary: | EAP62_2010 - [RFE] Logging Unification (JBoss Modules) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [JBoss] JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6 | Reporter: | Brian Stansberry <brian.stansberry> |
| Component: | Class Loading | Assignee: | David M. Lloyd <david.lloyd> |
| Status: | CLOSED EOL | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 6.1.0 | CC: | cdewolf, dandread, david.lloyd, nziakova, pkremens |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2019-08-19 12:45:27 UTC | Type: | Enhancement |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Brian Stansberry
2013-08-21 19:57:27 UTC
Still working on a viable solution. Cannot be fixed for 6.2. Hey David, can you provide some justification on why this will be deferred, (or will not be done at all?). Thanks. It's a technical problem. Our i18n logging solution requires jboss-logging; jboss-logging is not available to jboss-modules because it is loaded *as* a module, so jboss-modules cannot link directly against it. JBoss Modules also has an internal logging API which is designed to accommodate the logging system initializing after the module system bootstraps; this API also constrains how the logging implementation can be implemented, so to change that somehow would break compatibility, which is a consideration for any proposed solution. So far I do not have a workable solution to this problem, so it cannot be fixed until a solution presents itself. So, it's a chicken-egg problem, thanks. Exactly. I have a couple ideas but I don't know if they're really workable, but I do know it can't be done by 6.2 in any case. |