Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1002412

Summary: discover failed: Join failed ((17, u'CIM_ERR_METHOD_NOT_FOUND'))
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: David Spurek <dspurek>
Component: openlmi-providersAssignee: Tomas Smetana <tsmetana>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: BaseOS QE Security Team <qe-baseos-security>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 7.0CC: dspurek, ebenes, pkis
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-09-04 11:13:38 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description David Spurek 2013-08-29 07:07:04 UTC 
Description of problem:

Running through this test case

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_realmd_join_openlmi

openlmi-providers-0.1.1-2.el7

Actual behavior:

$ /usr/local/bin/realmd-cim -u pegasus -p XXXX -v discover security.baseos.qe
Connecting to: https://localhost:5989
Discovering domain: security.baseos.qe
discover failed: Join failed ((17, u'CIM_ERR_METHOD_NOT_FOUND'))

Expected results:

No error should occur, and domain should be discovered.
Comment 1 Patrik Kis 2013-09-30 11:28:54 UTC 
The list does not works too:

# realmd-cim -u pegasus -p uM4twGrL list
list failed: (5, u'CIM_ERR_INVALID_CLASS: LMI_RealmdKerberosRealm')
Comment 2 Tomas Smetana 2013-10-03 15:07:33 UTC 
Looks like the provider has not been installed/registered properly.  I'll check whether the test case works OK to be sure.
Comment 3 Tomas Smetana 2013-10-04 12:53:24 UTC 
So the problem is elsewhere: the API has been greatly simplified since the Fedora test day.  Currently the provider implements only the following methods: RequestStateChange, StopService, ChangeAffectedElementsAssignedSequence, LeaveDomain, JoinDomain, StartService.

Then the Domain string property that contains the name of the joined domain or NULL if the system is not enrolled into a domain.

There is also an updated version of the realmd-cim script in the upstream sources:

https://fedorahosted.org/openlmi/browser/openlmi-providers/src/realmd/doc/examples/realmd-cim

To sum it up: 'discover' and 'list' were left out of the API and won't work...
Comment 4 Tomas Smetana 2013-10-08 08:07:15 UTC 
I'm turning this to a feature request for 7.1: Let's try to re-implement the realm discovery and listing in the provider again.
Comment 5 Patrik Kis 2013-11-01 08:46:55 UTC 
Removing blocks for bug 922080, because as the target release was changed to RHEL-7.1 and this feature was not requested in original requirement.
Comment 6 Tomas Smetana 2014-07-23 11:15:10 UTC 
This is not very likely to be implemented: we've had some discussions about this feature and it looks like the ability to discover the domains remotely is not actually worth the problems (like breaking the model, therefore the API).