Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 1006398
[RFE] GUI: tab-panel within details pane (within sub-tab) lacks standard layout (e.g. snapshot details, VM NIC details)
Last modified: 2015-04-02 14:32:38 EDT
Description of problem:
In the ovirt-engine web interface the snapshot details pane lacks standard layout.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ovirt 3.3 / Fefora 19
1. connect to ovirt-engine via browser
2. in the tree on the left select system
3. select the VM tab
4. choose a single VM ( a detail window on the bottom will appear)
5. selct the snapshot tab
A snapshot detail window opens but the tabs (General, disks, ...) are not presented in ovirt standard design.
Same look and feel like other menu tabs in ovirt.
More details here http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2013-September/016223.html or in the attached screenshot.
Created attachment 796035 [details]
Same problem exists in the network interface tab. picture attached.
Created attachment 798417 [details]
Created attachment 800624 [details]
screen-shot: VM NIC details
indeed - same design exists also in the VM NIC details pane (see attachment 800624 [details]). both need to be changed. adjusting Whiteboard and Subject accordingly.
setting target release to current version for consideration and review. please do not push non-RFE bugs to an undefined target release to make sure bugs are reviewed for relevancy, fix, closure, etc.
Getting the status changes after three months I assume that the fix won't be a one liner. This and my other bug reports about UI glitches have been opened with new OVirt users in mind that come from ESX.
For a first timer the impression of the Admin UI should be comfortable - without visual mistakes. This and the easy setup of a node are the flagships for someone who spents his first day of testing with OVirt.
Please get this comment right. I do not want to mock up and raise the priority of this RFE. I just want to get as many people as possible attracted to Ovirt.
Closing old bugs. If this issue is still relevant/important in current version, please re-open the bug.