Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 1007101
[abrt] btrfs-progs-0.20.rc1.20130308git704a08c-1.fc19: __assert_fail_base: Process /usr/sbin/btrfsck was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Last modified: 2013-11-26 10:26:16 EST
Description of problem:
Tried to recover crashed drive with 'btrfs recover'
Version-Release number of selected component:
cmdline: btrfsck /dev/sdd2
runlevel: N 5
var_log_messages: Sep 10 18:13:15 waldorf abrt: Saved core dump of pid 12117 (/usr/sbin/btrfsck) to /var/tmp/abrt/ccpp-2013-09-10-18:12:41-12117 (316387328 bytes)
Thread no. 1 (5 frames)
#3 __assert_fail_base at assert.c:92
#4 __assert_fail at assert.c:101
#5 free_extent_buffer at extent_io.c:604
#6 close_ctree at disk-io.c:1323
#7 cmd_check at cmds-check.c:3660
Created attachment 796562 [details]
Created attachment 796563 [details]
Created attachment 796564 [details]
Created attachment 796565 [details]
Created attachment 796566 [details]
Created attachment 796567 [details]
Created attachment 796568 [details]
Created attachment 796569 [details]
Created attachment 796570 [details]
A new git snapshot of btrfs-progs has been pushed to F19 testing. If possible, please re-test these bugs & feel free to close or comment as appropriate.
This is a mass update of F19 and F20 btrfs-progs bugs.
A btrfs-progs git snapshot has been built in Rawhide and submitted for F19 and F20 testing.
If your bug was reproducible, please re-test with the new build, and update this bug to let us know if it's been resolved. If so I can add it to the Bodhi errata.
It's probably clear by now that nobody is going to look at these old abrt bugs on ancient btrfs-progs snapshots. So let's just be honest about it and close them.
Much newer code is being pushed out to F19 and F20 and rawhide; hopefully new abrt issues can be given more attention in the future.