Hide Forgot
Description of problem: auto install ovirt-node-iso with the follow parameters: BOOTIF=bond0 storage_init=/dev/sda bond=bond0:eth0,eth1 firstboot it will enter TUI install process not auto install process Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ovirt-node-iso-3.1.0-0.999.999.20130909102449gitbee8c8f.564.fc18.iso How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: Actual result: Expect result: Additional info: --
hmm...this might be a bug instead of an RFE. Fabian, thoughts?
Yep, that sounds more like a bug. Basically that cmdline should trigger an auto install and create a bond device.
> > Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): > ovirt-node-iso-3.1.0-0.999.999.20130909102449gitbee8c8f.564.fc18.iso I actually can't find the commit bee8c8f. Does it maybe contain a custom patch? Additionally adding BOOTIF=link storage_init bond=bond0:eth1,eth2 to the cmdline triggers the auto install - with downstream build based on 3.0.1.
(In reply to Fabian Deutsch from comment #3) > > > > Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): > > ovirt-node-iso-3.1.0-0.999.999.20130909102449gitbee8c8f.564.fc18.iso > > I actually can't find the commit bee8c8f. Does it maybe contain a custom > patch? > Using the latest master patch of ovirt-node upstream iso: http://jenkins.ovirt.org/view/ovirt_node/job/node-devel/646/distro=fedora18/artifact/ovirt-node-iso-3.1.0-0.999.999.20130916155620git5cc2ee2.646.fc18.iso could reproduce this issue. > Additionally adding > BOOTIF=link storage_init bond=bond0:eth1,eth2 > to the cmdline triggers the auto install - with downstream build based on > 3.0.1. Hey Fabian, using bond=bond0:eth0,eth1 will create bond0, i report this bug to want using "BOOTIF=bond0" to configure this bond and make network up.
(In reply to haiyang,dong from comment #4) > Hey Fabian, > > using bond=bond0:eth0,eth1 will create bond0, i report this bug to want > using "BOOTIF=bond0" to configure this bond and make network up. Ah yes. Thanks for pointing that out. Yes, true that is not working. And yes, as Mike noted, this is more an RFE.
pushing to target release 3.5, assuming its not planned for 3.4 at this point...
Isn't this fixed in BZ #1008286?