Hide Forgot
Description of problem: Using virt-viewer and specifying ports 22 or 25 end up with a different error logging message than "GSpice-WARNING **: Connection refused." [root@kaitain ~]# remote-viewer spice://localhost:22 (remote-viewer:19821): GSpice-WARNING **: invalid SPICE_MAGIC! Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): RHEL6.5-20130911.n.1 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
You probably have some daemons listening on port 22 and 25 (ssh and smtp), which would send some data to remote-viewer when it attempts to connect. The client tells you this data does not match what it expects. I'm not exactly sure what you'd expect in this situation? No GSpice-Warning at all? Or something else?
Every other port replies with "GSpice-WARNING **: Connection refused." I kind of expect that instead of the "GSpice-WARNING **: invalid SPICE_MAGIC!" where I made reference to in the initial description.
Oh, BTW, this is on a single RHEL 6.5 instance where the remote-viewer is being launched by the command-line.
(In reply to Bill Sanford from comment #2) > Every other port replies with "GSpice-WARNING **: Connection refused." > > I kind of expect that instead of the "GSpice-WARNING **: invalid > SPICE_MAGIC!" where I made reference to in the initial description. Imo 'invalid SPICE_MAGIC' is more correct than 'connection refused' in this case. We could reword the warning message if you think that's useful, but I don't think it's that important. If you install more services on your box, you'll get this message for more ports.
I agree with Christophe, closing for now