Bug 1008850 - /dev/pts/ptmx Centos 6.4
Summary: /dev/pts/ptmx Centos 6.4
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: device-mapper
Version: 6.4
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Other
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: LVM and device-mapper development team
QA Contact: Cluster QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-09-17 07:58 UTC by micheal
Modified: 2017-02-14 15:30 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-07-17 16:50:58 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description micheal 2013-09-17 07:58:13 UTC
I have a problem with the server running on CentOS. CentOs has been upgraded to version 6.4 and has wsystkie updates. Updates were made according to the official repositories. On the server running the V-Server.

#--------------------------------------------FSTAB------------------------------------------#
# Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump Pass
/dev/sda1 /boot ext3 rw,noatime 1 2
/dev/vg0/root / ext3 rw,noatime 1 1
/dev/vg0/swap none swap sw 0 0
/dev/vg0/usr /usr ext3 rw,noatime 1 2
/dev/vg0/var /var ext3 rw,noatime 1 2
/dev/vg0/log /var/log ext3 rw,noatime 1 2
/dev/vg0/tmp /tmp ext3 rw,noatime,nosuid,noexec 1 2
/dev/vg0/home /home ext3 rw,noatime 1 2
/dev/vg0/vz /vservers ext3 rw,noatime 1 2
tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0
devpts /dev/pts devpts rw,gid=5,mode=620 0 0
sysfs /sys sysfs defaults 0 0
proc /proc proc defaults 0 0

The problem is with / dev / pts / ptmx

#host /dev/pts > ls -la
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Sep 12 12:34 .
drwxr-xr-x 18 root root 3860 Sep 12 12:34 ..
crw--w---- 1 mmichalski tty 136, 0 Sep 12 12:53 0
c--------- 1 root root 5, 2 Sep 12 12:34 ptmx

As you can see it has no rights. The same situation is running virtual. Below is the fstab file virtual

none /proc proc defaults 0 0
none /tmp tmpfs size=16m,mode=1777 0 0
none /dev/pts devpts gid=5,mode=620 0 0

What can cause this problem and where to look for solutions?

Comment 2 Zdenek Kabelac 2014-01-28 14:08:00 UTC
Hmm - what is the actual problem?

How it is related to device mapper?

Is lvm2 reading this device ?

Or your problem with just access rights ? (Then I'd have guessed it's a bug for udevd and udev rules or eventually systemd)


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.