Hide Forgot
Created attachment 802498 [details] auto attach subscription selectable Description of problem: Auto-Attach subscriptions displayed in register dialog should not be "selectable". If there were to be more than one product displayed in the table, it would give a perception that we are choosing what we want to attach since we can select/highlight a particular row. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): # rpm -qa | egrep "subscription-manager|python-rhsm" subscription-manager-1.9.7-1.el6.x86_64 subscription-manager-migration-1.9.7-1.el6.x86_64 subscription-manager-firstboot-1.9.7-1.el6.x86_64 python-rhsm-debuginfo-1.9.6-1.el6.x86_64 subscription-manager-debuginfo-1.9.7-1.el6.x86_64 python-rhsm-1.9.6-1.el6.x86_64 subscription-manager-gui-1.9.7-1.el6.x86_64 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Register system to candlepin 2. Click Auto-Attach 3. Choose SLA click Next 4. See Attachment Actual results: See Attachment Expected results: Would prefer this table to be used only for displaying the subscriptions without the option to highlight/select the rows being displayed. Similar to "Products" in "Subscription Details" displayed in "All Available Subscription". Also would want the table to have a name right now it has no-name. This is for the sake of AT-SPI locator :) Additional info:
With the changes suggested I think the table would no longer be "sortable" on columns. I'm not sue though
Disabling selection on the table does not disable sorting on the table. Will enabled sorting cause you issues when testing?
Fixed in master 5d7d98fe64867d16a04defaada898568de0a9918 Avaliable in subscription-manager-1.10.3-1+
Created attachment 809028 [details] auto-attach-product-display-window Version: Tested on stage # subscription-manager version server type: Red Hat Subscription Management subscription management server: Unknown subscription-manager: 1.9.9-1.el6 python-rhsm: 1.9.6-1.el6 Verification see attachment. The products are no longer selectable and the table can still be sored VERIFIED
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1659.html