Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 1013532
[abrt] btrfs-progs-0.20.rc1.20130917git194aa4a-1.fc19: __assert_fail_base: Process /usr/sbin/btrfsck was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Last modified: 2013-11-26 10:26:35 EST
Version-Release number of selected component:
cmdline: btrfsck /dev/sdb2
runlevel: N 5
var_log_messages: Sep 30 11:42:27 localhost abrt: Saved core dump of pid 1825 (/usr/sbin/btrfsck) to /var/tmp/abrt/ccpp-2013-09-30-11:42:08-1825 (323526656 bytes)
Thread no. 1 (5 frames)
#3 __assert_fail_base at assert.c:92
#4 __assert_fail at assert.c:101
#5 btrfs_read_fs_root_no_cache at disk-io.c:632
#6 check_fs_roots at cmds-check.c:1853
#7 cmd_check at cmds-check.c:5818
Created attachment 805046 [details]
Created attachment 805047 [details]
Created attachment 805048 [details]
Created attachment 805049 [details]
Created attachment 805050 [details]
Created attachment 805051 [details]
Created attachment 805052 [details]
Created attachment 805053 [details]
Created attachment 805054 [details]
This is a mass update of F19 and F20 btrfs-progs bugs.
A btrfs-progs git snapshot has been built in Rawhide and submitted for F19 and F20 testing.
If your bug was reproducible, please re-test with the new build, and update this bug to let us know if it's been resolved. If so I can add it to the Bodhi errata.
It's probably clear by now that nobody is going to look at these old abrt bugs on ancient btrfs-progs snapshots. So let's just be honest about it and close them.
Much newer code is being pushed out to F19 and F20 and rawhide; hopefully new abrt issues can be given more attention in the future.