Bug 1016052 - Wrong element name in messaging section about address-settings
Summary: Wrong element name in messaging section about address-settings
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6
Classification: JBoss
Component: Documentation
Version: 6.3.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: GA
: EAP 6.3.0
Assignee: Misha H. Ali
QA Contact: Russell Dickenson
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-10-07 12:08 UTC by Martin Svehla
Modified: 2014-08-14 15:20 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Build Name: 14874, Administration and Configuration Guide-6.2-1 Build Date: 02-10-2013 13:01:57 Topic ID: 640-432966 [Latest]
Last Closed: 2014-06-28 15:41:40 UTC
Type: Bug

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Martin Svehla 2013-10-07 12:08:39 UTC 
Title: Configure Delayed Redelivery

Describe the issue:
Last paragraph says: "Address wildcards can be used on the <address-setting-match> element to configure the redelivery delay for addresses which match the wildcard."

However there is no element <address-setting-match>.


Suggestions for improvement:

The text should say something like "Address wildcards can be used on match attribute of <address-setting> element to configure..."
Comment 4 Scott Mumford 2014-02-26 05:14:02 UTC 
Moving to ON_QA.

The changes should be available for review on the documentation stage within an hour or so from this comment.

http://documentation-devel.engineering.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/JBoss_Enterprise_Application_Platform/
Comment 5 Scott Mumford 2014-02-26 05:15:54 UTC 
Moving to ON_QA.

The changes should be available for review on the documentation stage within an hour or so from this comment.

http://documentation-devel.engineering.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/JBoss_Enterprise_Application_Platform/
Comment 6 Martin Svehla 2014-02-26 09:41:49 UTC 
Looks good, thank you.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.