Description of problem: cannot upload kerneloopses Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: past 10 kerneloopses Steps to Reproduce: 1. from my pc try report kernel oops 2. using kernel-debug-* 3. Actual results: Today 1: (one time) --- Running report_uReport --- Server responded with an error: 'Validation failed: error validating 'installed_package': error validating 'architecture': string "x86_64+debug" contains illegal characters' --- Running report_Bugzilla --- Essential element 'component' is missing, can't continue ('report_Bugzilla' exited with 1) 2: (9 times) --- Running report_uReport --- Server responded with an error: 'Invalid JSON file' --- Running report_Bugzilla --- Essential element 'component' is missing, can't continue ('report_Bugzilla' exited with 1)
Versions: abrt-desktop-2.1.7-1.fc20.x86_64 abrt-addon-python-2.1.7-1.fc20.x86_64 abrt-plugin-bodhi-2.1.7-1.fc20.x86_64 abrt-2.1.7-1.fc20.x86_64 abrt-gui-libs-2.1.7-1.fc20.x86_64 abrt-addon-kerneloops-2.1.7-1.fc20.x86_64 abrt-retrace-client-2.1.7-1.fc20.x86_64 abrt-java-connector-1.0.6-1.fc20.x86_64 abrt-addon-ccpp-2.1.7-1.fc20.x86_64 abrt-dbus-2.1.7-1.fc20.x86_64 abrt-addon-xorg-2.1.7-1.fc20.x86_64 abrt-addon-vmcore-2.1.7-1.fc20.x86_64 abrt-gui-2.1.7-1.fc20.x86_64 abrt-libs-2.1.7-1.fc20.x86_64 abrt-addon-pstoreoops-2.1.7-1.fc20.x86_64
Are you running the official kernel from the fedora repository? Please provide the output of the following commands: uname -a rpm -q kernel
(In reply to Jiri Moskovcak from comment #2) > Are you running the official kernel from the fedora repository? Please > provide the output of the following commands: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=4456086 > > uname -a Linux torrent.frankly3d.home 3.11.3-301.fc20.x86_64+debug #1 SMP Thu Oct 3 00:43:32 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > rpm -q kernel rpm -q kernel package kernel is not installed rpm -q kernel-debug rpm -q kernel-debug kernel-debug-3.11.3-301.fc20.x86_64 it is official kernel with debug switched on, was trying to diagnose kernel problem(s)
Thanks, that's exactly the info we needed. reassigning to satyr because it's responsible for parsing the kernel version.
Since version 0.10 (commit 69bcefae51f8db7f8200510421044c2a423a083b), satyr takes parsed kernel version from ABRT. The logic for finding out the kernel package is not robust enough to handle kernel-debug package. I've sent patch to change it: https://github.com/abrt/abrt/pull/725 Frank: if you have time, can you please test it with satyr-0.10 from koji [1] and abrt-action-save-kernel-data script from [2]? [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=469764 [2] http://mmilata.fedorapeople.org/abrt-action-save-kernel-data
(In reply to Martin Milata from comment #5) > Since version 0.10 (commit 69bcefae51f8db7f8200510421044c2a423a083b), satyr > takes parsed kernel version from ABRT. The logic for finding out the kernel > package is not robust enough to handle kernel-debug package. I've sent patch > to change it: https://github.com/abrt/abrt/pull/725 > > Frank: if you have time, can you please test it with satyr-0.10 from koji > [1] and abrt-action-save-kernel-data script from [2]? > > [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=469764 > [2] http://mmilata.fedorapeople.org/abrt-action-save-kernel-data Upped a kernel-debug bz with them, please ignore. was just a practical test.