Bug 1017011 - Adding possibility to change type of object store to JDBC one under the Transaction subsytem
Summary: Adding possibility to change type of object store to JDBC one under the Trans...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6
Classification: JBoss
Component: Web Console
Version: 6.2.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Harald Pehl
QA Contact: Jakub Cechacek
Russell Dickenson
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-10-09 07:09 UTC by Ondrej Chaloupka
Modified: 2015-11-23 08:59 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-07-02 14:13:46 UTC
Type: Feature Request

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker HAL-444 0 Minor Closed Adding possibility to change type of object store to JDBC one under the Transaction subsytem 2016-04-13 14:10:42 UTC

Description Ondrej Chaloupka 2013-10-09 07:09:15 UTC 
Web console currently contains item "Use HornetQ Store?" under tab Common.
This allows user change the object store which will be used for saving information about on-fly transactions.

The EAP 6.2.0 comes with new type of object store - JDBC object store. I suppose that adding such configuration option would be logical step.

The JDBC object store needs to be referenced to existing datasource and its settings have following limitations:
 - it has to be standard datasource (not the xa one)
 - the datasource *has to* be set as jta=false (otherwise the server even fails to start)
 - the server has to be restarted for the jdbc object store would be activated  (reload is not enough)
Comment 1 Ondrej Chaloupka 2013-10-10 14:11:51 UTC 
I've got one more idea about this - when JDBC object store is set then hornetq object store has to be deactivated. Maybe there could be better to have radio buttons with file system/hornetq/jdbc object stores. But this is just an idea.
Comment 2 Heiko Braun 2014-07-02 14:07:02 UTC 
Please use the community Jira for feature requests next time.
Comment 3 Heiko Braun 2014-07-02 14:13:46 UTC 
The JDBC store config seems to be more complex than just a the data source name. Please create feature request in the community Jira and outline the complete use case and everything impact/constraint it might have on the hornetq store configuration option.

I am going to close this one.
Comment 4 JBoss JIRA Server 2015-11-04 10:37:30 UTC 
Heiko Braun <ike.braun> updated the status of jira HAL-444 to Coding In Progress
Comment 5 JBoss JIRA Server 2015-11-23 08:59:25 UTC 
Heiko Braun <ike.braun> updated the status of jira HAL-444 to Resolved
Comment 6 JBoss JIRA Server 2015-11-23 08:59:32 UTC 
Heiko Braun <ike.braun> updated the status of jira HAL-444 to Reopened
Comment 7 JBoss JIRA Server 2015-11-23 08:59:38 UTC 
Heiko Braun <ike.braun> updated the status of jira HAL-444 to Closed
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.