Bug 1019102 - Mismash in wording - clustered tx and distributed tx
Summary: Mismash in wording - clustered tx and distributed tx
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6
Classification: JBoss
Component: Documentation
Version: 6.2.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: David Michael
QA Contact: Russell Dickenson
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-10-15 07:33 UTC by Ondrej Chaloupka
Modified: 2014-08-18 08:48 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Build Name: 14874, Administration and Configuration Guide-6.2-1 Build Date: 02-10-2013 13:01:57 Topic ID: 4316-495474 [Latest]
Last Closed: 2014-08-18 08:48:47 UTC
Type: Bug


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ondrej Chaloupka 2013-10-15 07:33:46 UTC
Title: JTA Clustering Limitations

Hi,

I would like ask for rephrasing this section. There is some inconsistency in using term clustered txs. What I suppose the user understand in word clustered transaction is possibility of some replication of the transaction state in session. Not such feature is currently available.

This chapter should be named like limitation of JTA in distribution

When you want to get distributed transactions you have to use JTS. But in fact that's not even true now we have JBoss Remoting distributed JTA (check the documentation about jta distributed transaction).

It would be nice when this chapter talks about the misleading terms - I mean clustering and distributed transactions (for some info check https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018851).

Thanks

Comment 2 Ondrej Chaloupka 2014-08-18 08:48:47 UTC
Hi,
yeap, this bz is really obsolete. Closing as no a bug if you don't mind.
Thanks
Ondra


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.