Hide Forgot
Description of problem: there is issue in requires of openlmi-indicationmanager-libs-devel Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): openlmi-indicationmanager-libs-devel.x86_64 0:0.3.0-1.el7 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 0. add latest repodata: baseurl=http://download-01.eng.brq.redhat.com/pub/rhel/nightly/latest-RHEL-7/compose/Server/x86_64/os # it should be RHEL-7.0-20131018.n.0 1. yum install openlmi* Actual results: [root@pes-guest-90 test]# yum install openlmi-indicationmanager-libs-devel Loaded plugins: product-id, subscription-manager This system is not registered to Red Hat Subscription Management. You can use subscription-manager to register. Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package openlmi-indicationmanager-libs-devel.x86_64 0:0.3.0-1.el7 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: openlmi-providers(x86-64) = 0.3.0-1.el7 for package: openlmi-indicationmanager-libs-devel-0.3.0-1.el7.x86_64 --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: openlmi-indicationmanager-libs-devel-0.3.0-1.el7.x86_64 (beaker-Server-optional) Requires: openlmi-providers(x86-64) = 0.3.0-1.el7 Installed: openlmi-providers-0.3.0-2.el7.x86_64 (@beaker-Server) openlmi-providers(x86-64) = 0.3.0-2.el7 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest Expected results: I can do: "yum install openlmi*" Additional info:
This seems to be an issue with the repositories: You're trying to install openlmi-indicationmanager-libs-devel.x86_64 0:0.3.0-1.el7, which requires openlmi-providers package. But there is already openlmi-providers-0.3.0-2 in the repo. But there is no openlmi-indicationmanager-libs-devel-0.3.0-2 in the optional repo. It looks like the repo was not synced when you tried. There is correct package there now: http://download-01.eng.brq.redhat.com/pub/rhel/nightly/latest-RHEL-7/compose/Server-optional/x86_64/os/Packages/ Can you please retry it?
This one is duplicate of bug 1019664. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1019664 ***