Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 1021353
The grub miss the backup version after upgrade in uefi machines.
Last modified: 2014-01-21 14:55:25 EST
Description of problem: The grub miss the backup version after upgrade in uefi machines. e.g. 1. upgrade form rhev-hypervisor6-6.5-20131017.0.iso to itself. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): rhev-hypervisor6-6.5-20131017.0.iso ovirt-node-3.0.1-4.el6.noarch How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install rhev-hypervisor6-6.5-20131017.0.iso to uefi machine. 2. Upgrade rhevh to latest version 3. focus on grub. Actual results: 1. The grub miss the backup version after upgrade in UEFI machine. 2. No such issue in legacy(non-uefi) machines. Expected results: Gurb can save the backup version part after upgrade. Additional info:
No this issue in rhev-h 6.4.z, so it's a regression bug
Test version: ovirt-node-3.0.1-9.el6_5.noarch.rpm rhevh-6.5-20131213.0.0.iso Test as the follow steps: 1. Install rhevh-6.5-20131213.0.0.iso to uefi machine. 2. Upgrade rhevh to itself. 3. focus on grub. Test results: Gurb can save the backup version part after upgrade. [root@dhcp-8-154 admin]# cat /mnt/EFI/redhat/grub.conf device (hd0) HD(1,800,79800,8e6fb9da-6d32-4fd7-ba7e-32b96eb40130) default saved timeout 5 hiddenmenu splashimage=(hd0,1)/grub/splash.xpm.gz title RHEV Hypervisor 6.5-20131213.0 root (hd0,1) kernel /vmlinuz0 root=live:LABEL=Root ro rootfstype=auto rootflags=ro LANG=en_US.utf8 crashkernel=128M elevator=deadline rhgb quiet rd_NO_LVM rd.luks=0 rd.md=0 rd.dm=0 initrd /initrd0.img title BACKUP RHEV Hypervisor 6.5-20131213.0 root (hd0,2) kernel /vmlinuz0 root=live:LABEL=RootBackup ro rootfstype=auto rootflags=ro LANG=en_US.utf8 crashkernel=128M elevator=deadline rhgb quiet rd_NO_LVM rd.luks=0 rd.md=0 rd.dm=0 initrd /initrd0.img savedefault so this bug has been fixed, after the status of this bug changed into "ON_QA", i'll verify it.
According to comment 9, change it into "verified".
This bug is currently attached to errata RHBA-2013:15277. If this change is not to be documented in the text for this errata please either remove it from the errata, set the requires_doc_text flag to minus (-), or leave a "Doc Text" value of "--no tech note required" if you do not have permission to alter the flag. Otherwise to aid in the development of relevant and accurate release documentation, please fill out the "Doc Text" field above with these four (4) pieces of information: * Cause: What actions or circumstances cause this bug to present. * Consequence: What happens when the bug presents. * Fix: What was done to fix the bug. * Result: What now happens when the actions or circumstances above occur. (NB: this is not the same as 'the bug doesn't present anymore') Once filled out, please set the "Doc Type" field to the appropriate value for the type of change made and submit your edits to the bug. For further details on the Cause, Consequence, Fix, Result format please refer to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#cf_release_notes Thank you for your help.
Hiya, could you let me know what the problem was and what the fix was for the doc text? Thanks.
Also this bug was fixed in the follow version: rhevh-6.5-20140110.1 ovirt-node-3.0.1-16.el6_5.noarch
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0033.html