RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1022708 - RHEL6 sssd upgrade restorecon workaround for /var/lib/sss/mc context
Summary: RHEL6 sssd upgrade restorecon workaround for /var/lib/sss/mc context
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: sssd
Version: 6.4
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
urgent
urgent
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Jakub Hrozek
QA Contact: Kaushik Banerjee
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 987456
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-10-23 20:09 UTC by Jan Kurik
Modified: 2018-12-03 20:26 UTC (History)
13 users (show)

Fixed In Version: sssd-1.9.2-82.11.el6_4
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Previously, RPM did not reload its labels database in a single transaction. Consequently, when sssd was upgraded and pulled in a new selinux-policy in a single transaction, the new context added by the selinux-policy-targeted utility was not used for the files in the /var/lib/sss/mc/ directory. To fix this bug, sssd has been set to run restorecon in the %post scriptlet until RPM can properly handle it, and thus correct context is set.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-20 11:05:08 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2013:1742 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE sssd bug fix update 2013-11-20 16:03:11 UTC

Description Jan Kurik 2013-10-23 20:09:02 UTC 
This bug has been copied from bug #987456 and has been proposed
to be backported to 6.4 z-stream (EUS).
Comment 6 Clifton Coursey 2013-10-29 14:03:40 UTC 
The customer has confirmed that the packages fixes his current issue.

From the case# 00969058:

<snip>
I can confirm that this package fixes the issue we're having.
<snip>

--cliff
Comment 7 Jakub Hrozek 2013-10-30 10:11:40 UTC 
(In reply to Clifton Coursey from comment #6)
> The customer has confirmed that the packages fixes his current issue.
> 
> From the case# 00969058:
> 
> <snip>
> I can confirm that this package fixes the issue we're having.
> <snip>
> 
> --cliff

Great, thanks for testing! Any word on comment #5? Do they need a 6.5.z or can we give them access to the 6.5 bits?
Comment 8 Jakub Hrozek 2013-11-06 16:11:23 UTC 
(In reply to Jakub Hrozek from comment #7)
> (In reply to Clifton Coursey from comment #6)
> > The customer has confirmed that the packages fixes his current issue.
> > 
> > From the case# 00969058:
> > 
> > <snip>
> > I can confirm that this package fixes the issue we're having.
> > <snip>
> > 
> > --cliff
> 
> Great, thanks for testing! Any word on comment #5? Do they need a 6.5.z or
> can we give them access to the 6.5 bits?

ping; Any news?
Comment 14 errata-xmlrpc 2013-11-20 11:05:08 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1742.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.