Bug 1023032 - Missing methods from ConfigurationBuilder
Summary: Missing methods from ConfigurationBuilder
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: JBoss Data Grid 6
Classification: JBoss
Component: CPP Client
Version: 6.2.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 6.2.0
Assignee: Tristan Tarrant
QA Contact: Alan Field
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1017190
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-10-24 13:26 UTC by Alan Field
Modified: 2013-12-17 16:58 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Known Issue
Doc Text:
The ConfigurationBuilder class is missing the following methods which are present in the Java version of the client: <itemizedlist> <listitem> <para>asyncExecutorFactory()</para> </listitem> <listitem> <para>balancingStrategy(String)</para> </listitem> <listitem> <para>balancingStrategy(Class)</para> </listitem> <listitem> <para>build(boolean)</para> </listitem> <listitem> <para>consistentHashImpl(int, String)</para> </listitem> <listitem> <para>consistentHashImpl(int, Class)</para> </listitem> <listitem> <para>marshaller(String)</para> </listitem> <listitem> <para>marshaller(Class)</para> </listitem> <listitem> <para>marshaller(Marshaller)</para> </listitem> <listitem> <para>transportFactory(String)</para> </listitem> <listitem> <para>transportFactory(Class)</para> </listitem> </itemizedlist> As a result, the C++ HotRod cannot configure some of the attributes that can be configured in the Java version of the client.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-12-16 07:52:41 UTC
Type: Bug


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker HRCPP-42 0 Critical Resolved Missing methods from ConfigurationBuilder 2014-01-06 14:02:33 UTC

Description Alan Field 2013-10-24 13:26:35 UTC
JDG tracking bug

Comment 4 Tristan Tarrant 2013-12-16 07:52:41 UTC
We do not aim for full 1:1 compatibility of the configuration since some of the features that are easy to do in Java (providing alternative implementation of the transport and the hashing classes) are not worth the effort of porting over or make no sense at all in the context of C++.

Comment 5 JBoss JIRA Server 2013-12-17 16:58:35 UTC
Tristan Tarrant <ttarrant> updated the status of jira HRCPP-42 to Resolved


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.