Hide Forgot
Version-Release number of selected component: tracker-0.16.2-4.fc20 Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.1.9 backtrace_rating: 4 cmdline: /usr/libexec/tracker-miner-fs crash_function: strncmp executable: /usr/libexec/tracker-miner-fs kernel: 3.11.6-301.fc20.x86_64+debug runlevel: N 5 type: CCpp uid: 1000 Truncated backtrace: Thread no. 1 (9 frames) #0 strncmp at ../sysdeps/x86_64/strcmp.S:209 #1 file_node_data_equal_or_child at tracker-file-system.c:186 #2 file_tree_lookup at tracker-file-system.c:263 #3 tracker_file_system_set_property at tracker-file-system.c:724 #4 crawler_finished_cb at tracker-file-notifier.c:647 #5 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOOLEANv at gmarshal.c:188 #6 _g_closure_invoke_va at gclosure.c:840 #9 tracker_crawler_stop at tracker-crawler.c:914 #10 process_func at tracker-crawler.c:548 Potential duplicate: bug 812217
Created attachment 818641 [details] File: backtrace
Created attachment 818642 [details] File: cgroup
Created attachment 818643 [details] File: core_backtrace
Created attachment 818644 [details] File: dso_list
Created attachment 818645 [details] File: environ
Created attachment 818646 [details] File: exploitable
Created attachment 818647 [details] File: limits
Created attachment 818648 [details] File: maps
Created attachment 818649 [details] File: open_fds
Created attachment 818650 [details] File: proc_pid_status
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1018368 ***
(In reply to Debarshi Ray from comment #13) > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1018368 *** It's really quite annoying when public bugs -- the ones that abrt is going to find and direct one to -- are closed as a duplicate of a private bug. How are those of us afflicted with this bug supposed to contribute to and follow the process of private bugs that are affecting us every day?
(In reply to Brian J. Murrell from comment #14) > (In reply to Debarshi Ray from comment #13) > > > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1018368 *** > > It's really quite annoying when public bugs -- the ones that abrt is going > to find and direct one to -- are closed as a duplicate of a private bug. It should be OK now. > How are those of us afflicted with this bug supposed to contribute to and > follow the process of private bugs that are affecting us every day? Would have been happier if you had not assumed malice so easily.
(In reply to Debarshi Ray from comment #15) > > It should be OK now. Ahh. Thanks! > Would have been happier if you had not assumed malice so easily. I wasn't assuming malice, but just expressing my frustration as this happens more frequently than just occasionally. But you are right. I will try to keep my frustration to myself in the future.