Bug 1026082 – e-mail summary pane display not refreshed correctly

Bug 1026082 - e-mail summary pane display not refreshed correctly

Summary:	e-mail summary pane display not refreshed correctly

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1029835

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	thunderbird (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	19
Hardware:	x86_64 Linux

Priority	unspecified Severity high
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Gecko Maintainer
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2013-11-03 08:32 EST by Craig Goodyear
Modified:	2014-01-06 09:48 EST (History)
CC List:	3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2014-01-06 09:48:07 EST
Type:	Bug
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Craig Goodyear 2013-11-03 08:32:16 EST

Description of problem:
The pane showing the summary list of e-mails does not refresh correctly after collapsing and then expanding one of the e-mails that is threaded.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
thunderbird-24.1.0-1.fc19.x86_64

How reproducible:
every time

Steps to Reproduce:
1. collapse an e-mail that is threaded in the summary pane
2. expand the same e-mail thread
3. move the e-mail selection highlight through the listing of e-mails with the the keyboard

Actual results:
Some of the e-mails listed will be blanked out until the mouse cursor is moved over them.

Expected results:
All e-mails be properly displayed in the summary pane.

Additional info:

Comment 1 David Rees 2013-12-16 13:56:15 EST

This appears to be a dupe of #1029835 to me.

Comment 2 Martin Stransky 2014-01-06 09:48:07 EST

Yes, a dupe of Bug 1029835.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1029835 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.