Bug 1031698 - Gluster volume set command "owner-uid" returning success for invalid argument
Summary: Gluster volume set command "owner-uid" returning success for invalid argument
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: glusterfs
Version: 2.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Bug Updates Notification Mailing List
QA Contact: storage-qa-internal@redhat.com
URL:
Whiteboard: glusterd
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-11-18 15:00 UTC by Lalatendu Mohanty
Modified: 2015-03-23 07:39 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-03-23 07:36:45 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Lalatendu Mohanty 2013-11-18 15:00:40 UTC
Description of problem:

Gluster volume set command "owner-uid" returning success for wrong argument where it should return non-zero return code.

gluster volume set <volumename> owner-uid -978
Expected 1-255, got 0

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
glusterfs-3.3.0.7rhs-1.el6rhs.x86_64.rpm


How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a gluster volume
2. Run "gluster volume set <volumename> owner-uid -978" 
3. echo $?

Actual results:
Volume set command returns 0 (i.e. success)

Expected results:
it should be non zero

Additional info:

This bug is not present in RHS2.1

Comment 2 Vivek Agarwal 2015-03-23 07:36:45 UTC
The product version of Red Hat Storage on which this issue was reported has reached End Of Life (EOL) [1], hence this bug report is being closed. If the issue is still observed on a current version of Red Hat Storage, please file a new bug report on the current version.







[1] https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0821.html

Comment 3 Vivek Agarwal 2015-03-23 07:39:08 UTC
The product version of Red Hat Storage on which this issue was reported has reached End Of Life (EOL) [1], hence this bug report is being closed. If the issue is still observed on a current version of Red Hat Storage, please file a new bug report on the current version.







[1] https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0821.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.