Spec URL: http://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-resque.spec SRPM URL: http://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-resque-1.25.1-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Resque is a Redis-backed Ruby library for creating background jobs, placing those jobs on multiple queues, and processing them later. Background jobs can be any Ruby class or module that responds to perform. Your existing classes can easily be converted to background jobs or you can create new classes specifically to do work. Or, you can do both. Resque is heavily inspired by DelayedJob and is comprised of three parts: * A Ruby library for creating, querying, and processing jobs * A Rake task for starting a worker which processes jobs * A Sinatra app for monitoring queues, jobs, and workers. Fedora Account System Username: ktdreyer F21 scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6211939
Taking
Ken, looks great, fully complies with guidelines, builds against rawhide in Koji fine. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6234295 $ md5sum resque-1.25.1.gem* 3d85f26b0346ff1fbfea3698e142eb92 resque-1.25.1.gem 3d85f26b0346ff1fbfea3698e142eb92 resque-1.25.1.gem.upstream fedora-review has a complaint that "Gem should use %gem_install macro", not sure why it's saying this since your spec does infact use that, so ignoring that. ACK ====== Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - gems should require rubygems package Note: Requires: rubygems missing in rubygem-resque-doc See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#RubyGems ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated". 37 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/mmorsi/workspace/fedora/1033358-rubygem- resque/licensecheck.txt [ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gems, /usr/share/gems/doc [ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [ ]: Changelog in prescribed format. [ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package [ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ ]: Package does not generate any conflict. [ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Ruby: [ ]: Platform dependent files must all go under %{gem_extdir_mri}, platform independent under %{gem_dir}. [x]: Gem package must not define a non-gem subpackage [x]: Macro %{gem_extdir} is deprecated. [x]: Gem package is named rubygem-%{gem_name} [x]: Package contains BuildRequires: rubygems-devel. [x]: Gem package must define %{gem_name} macro. [x]: Pure Ruby package must be built as noarch [x]: Package does not contain Requires: ruby(abi). [x]: Package contains Requires: ruby(release). ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [ ]: Package functions as described. [ ]: Latest version is packaged. [ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [ ]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [ ]: %check is present and all tests pass. [ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. Ruby: [!]: Gem should use %gem_install macro. [ ]: Specfile should use macros from rubygem-devel package. Note: The specfile doesn't use these macros: /usr/share/gems/specifications/resque-1.25.1.gemspec, %exclude /usr/share/gems/cache/resque-1.25.1.gem [x]: Gem package should exclude cached Gem. [x]: Test suite of the library should be run. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: rubygem-resque-1.25.1-1.fc21.noarch.rpm rubygem-resque-doc-1.25.1-1.fc21.noarch.rpm rubygem-resque-1.25.1-1.fc21.src.rpm rubygem-resque.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) queueing -> queuing, queening, queering rubygem-resque.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary resque-web rubygem-resque.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary resque rubygem-resque.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) queueing -> queuing, queening, queering 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint rubygem-resque-doc rubygem-resque rubygem-resque.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) queueing -> queuing, queening, queering rubygem-resque.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary resque-web rubygem-resque.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary resque 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- rubygem-resque-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): rubygem-resque rubygem-resque (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): ruby(release) ruby(rubygems) rubygem(mono_logger) rubygem(multi_json) rubygem(redis-namespace) rubygem(sinatra) rubygem(vegas) Provides -------- rubygem-resque-doc: rubygem-resque-doc rubygem-resque: rubygem(resque) rubygem-resque Source checksums ---------------- https://rubygems.org/gems/resque-1.25.1.gem : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : fed22294c73b5c8e79de8c64fa12501f829574351ddfca1142cb330092bc335d CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : fed22294c73b5c8e79de8c64fa12501f829574351ddfca1142cb330092bc335d Generated by fedora-review 0.5.0 (920221d) last change: 2013-08-30 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1033358 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Ruby, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, SugarActivity, Perl, R, PHP Disabled flags: EPEL5, EXARCH, DISTTAG
Thanks Mo very much for the review! New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-resque Short Description: A Redis-backed queueing system Owners: ktdreyer Branches: f19 f20
Git done (by process-git-requests).
rubygem-resque-1.25.1-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-resque-1.25.1-1.fc19
rubygem-resque-1.25.1-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-resque-1.25.1-1.fc20
rubygem-resque-1.25.1-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository.
rubygem-resque-1.25.1-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.
rubygem-resque-1.25.1-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.