Bug 1034789 - TJWS Usage in SRAMP/DTGov
Summary: TJWS Usage in SRAMP/DTGov
Keywords:
Status: MODIFIED
Alias: None
Product: JBoss Fuse Service Works 6
Classification: JBoss
Component: DT Governance
Version: 6.0.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: CR1
: FUTURE
Assignee: Nick Cross
QA Contact: Matej Melko
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1035855
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-11-26 14:07 UTC by Nick Cross
Modified: 2021-09-15 05:48 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: Bug


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Nick Cross 2013-11-26 14:07:32 UTC
SRAMP/DTGov use TJWS from resteasy-jaxrs. Unfortunately EAP have not built the TJWS classes in that component. Therefore when we align to EAP versions, the code doesn't work because those classes don't exist. Would it be possible to use something else?

Comment 2 Gary Brown 2013-11-26 14:31:54 UTC
Hi Nick

Do you know why those classes weren't built in EAP?

At this late stage I don't think there is another option, unless there is a serious issue with TJWS that lead to it being left out of EAP.

Comment 3 Kurt T Stam 2013-11-26 14:44:17 UTC
Nick, I think we only use it for unit testing (to bring up an s-ramp server on the fly)? Why would this be an issue?

Comment 4 Nick Cross 2013-11-26 15:03:50 UTC
As the tjws classes don't actually exist in the EAP build of resteasy-jaxrs this causes compilation problems. 

Initially they said they don't support those classes but they are looking at this again. I have asked the EAP team if its feasible for them to rebuild their resteasy to include the missing classes.

Comment 5 Weinan Li 2013-11-27 11:50:52 UTC
Currently we have RESTEasy 2.3.7 for EAP6, and I could build resteasy-tjws based on this version, is that okay?

Comment 6 Nick Cross 2014-01-07 14:31:59 UTC
This is fixed by BZ1032115.

Comment 7 Nick Cross 2014-01-10 15:26:50 UTC
Reverting as 2.3.7 was built against EAP 6.2 and won't work for us.

Comment 9 Weinan Li 2014-03-03 13:15:00 UTC
Hi Nick, please assign back to me if anything more needs me :-)


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.