Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
It looks like java_frame.c lacks code to handle suppressed exceptions generated by the try-with-resource construct in Java 7. These backtraces look like this:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: outer
at Suppressed.main(Suppressed.java:7)
Suppressed: Suppressed$SuppressedException
at Suppressed.close(Suppressed.java:14)
at Suppressed.main(Suppressed.java:9)
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: inner
at Suppressed.main(Suppressed.java:5)
Sample source code:
public class Suppressed implements AutoCloseable {
public static void main(String[] args) {
try (Suppressed s = new Suppressed()) {
try {
throw new RuntimeException("inner");
} catch (RuntimeException e) {
throw new RuntimeException("outer", e);
}
}
}
@Override
public void close() {
throw new SuppressedException();
}
static class SuppressedException extends RuntimeException {
}
}
Fixed in upstream commit b3408be3bf997f5bad3b41ef195d2b125b2a8db2 (the suppressed exceptions are ignored for now as we can't include them in the reports without completely changing the report format).
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0556.html
It looks like java_frame.c lacks code to handle suppressed exceptions generated by the try-with-resource construct in Java 7. These backtraces look like this: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: outer at Suppressed.main(Suppressed.java:7) Suppressed: Suppressed$SuppressedException at Suppressed.close(Suppressed.java:14) at Suppressed.main(Suppressed.java:9) Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: inner at Suppressed.main(Suppressed.java:5) Sample source code: public class Suppressed implements AutoCloseable { public static void main(String[] args) { try (Suppressed s = new Suppressed()) { try { throw new RuntimeException("inner"); } catch (RuntimeException e) { throw new RuntimeException("outer", e); } } } @Override public void close() { throw new SuppressedException(); } static class SuppressedException extends RuntimeException { } }