Bug 1036153 - RFE: PM-326 consider adding Remote Java API samples -- DEVELOPMENT/PACKAGING DELIVERABLE
Summary: RFE: PM-326 consider adding Remote Java API samples -- DEVELOPMENT/PACKAGING...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: JBoss Operations Network
Classification: JBoss
Component: CLI
Version: JON 3.1.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
urgent
Target Milestone: post-GA
: JON 3.2.0
Assignee: Simeon Pinder
QA Contact: Mike Foley
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1029909
Blocks: PM-326, PRODMGT-326
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-11-29 15:20 UTC by Mike Foley
Modified: 2018-12-04 16:29 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of: PM-326, PRODMGT-326
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-01-03 18:15:43 UTC
Type: Feature Request
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker PRODMGT-326 0 Major Resolved Need various Java examples using the Remote API 2015-08-19 18:28:33 UTC
Red Hat Knowledge Base (Solution) 478463 0 None None None Never

Comment 1 Mike Foley 2013-11-29 15:21:28 UTC 
This BZ is the development deliverable for packaging the Java samples.
Comment 5 Mike Foley 2013-12-02 18:03:17 UTC 
The CLI should be consistent...and any changes in the API are regressions on the server ... not on the examples.   I think this needs to be in CR1 payload..or it is wasted effort.   The inclusion of the samples is a blocker for PM-326, and therefore a blocker for GA.

QE will retest ASAP.  It will be done tomorrow.
Comment 10 Mike Foley 2013-12-02 20:06:32 UTC 
ok ... so the QE re-test is complete.  no regressions in the samples or remote api, which is good.

there is an annoying error that appears frequently.  



 ERROR: This client [4.9.0.JON320ER7] does not support the remote server
 [3.2.0.ER7] - 'rhq.client.version-check' was not set
 to true so this client will be allowed to continue but expect errors


this may have to do with the ejb remote client ... and there may be a separate bz coming here on this.
Comment 11 Mike Foley 2014-01-03 18:15:43 UTC 
this is completed
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.