Hi, I don't think I've seen this one yet. It is SIMILAR to the tracebacks listed in the gotchas: http://www.redhat.com/support/docs/gotchas/6.1/gotchas-6.1-4.html#ss4.15 and in bugs: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7879 http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9607 I am installing using the official RH CD. I have updated the boot floppy image as per the gotchas, and the python update. I insert the update when prompted and proceed through all of the questions. I previously had the "unsubscriptable object" (or something like that) traceback which seems to be fixed now. This traceback occurs prior to installing packages, immediately after the installer builds the package list or something, after formatting the swap partition, and after detecting my video card. Here is the latest traceback: File "/usr/bin/anaconda", line 227, in ? intf.run(todo, test = test) File "/usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages/text.py", line 1009, in run rc = apply (step[1](), step [2]) File "/usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages/text.py", line 572, in __call__ if todo.doInstall(): File "/usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages/todo.py", line 1477, in doInstall db = rpm.opendb (1, self.instPath) rpm.error: cannot open Crash-ola. There is also another error message which is obscured by the traceback "window", and it looks like this: Cannot [THIS PART IS OBSCURED] tsindex.rpm: Invalid argument If I use the GUI instead, it simply hangs at approximately the same point. I don't know how to see any error messages it might be producing. I'm using an AMD K6/200, Award BIOS, generic S3 Trio video, no sound, 2G Maxtor HDD (primary master) + .5G Fujitsu (primary slave), 96M RAM. This machine was running Red Hat 5.2 previously, without any difficulty. <rant> I am a computer professional. I just spent several years in Silicon Valley working as a system administrator, then as a programmer. I have spent the entire weekend staring at various versions of this Red Hat installer. It has been a complete waste of time. I tell you this: if I can't install Red Hat Linux, then no one else that I know (personally) can do it either. My Mom sure can't, which means that Red Hat Linux will never replace MS Windows on her desktop (if it weren't for Windows 98, I wouldn't be able to submit this bug report because my Linux machine is now hosed). I think that Red Hat is doing the Linux community a disservice by publishing this installer. This is poor, poor, sloppy software IMHO. My brother thinks I should use Mandrake. Unfortunately, I must use Red Hat since my employer insists on it. I have tried many combinations, including FTP attempts from 3 different servers, trying RH6.0 and 6.1, hard disk installs of both versions, and today I finally gave in and bought the "official" Red Hat CD which I can't seem to use either, officially. Yesterday, I was trying to find a workaround, and I chose the "Server Install" by mistake. Before my fingers could reach CTRL-ALT-DEL the installer began reformatting my /home filesystem, without prompting me. Thanks, Red Hat. </rant> Please let me know if there is a workaround for this, because I need to use this machine for work.
Forwarding this issue to a developer for further action. As a side note, have you tried out latest installer to see whether it exhibits the same behavior? We just recently released Red Hat Linux 6.2, and the installer present in the 6.1 release is really shored up in the 6.2 release.
There are confirmation windows in the latest development version to confirm before proceeding with an install or upgrade.