Bug 1037270 - quota: "EDQUOT" for rename of contents inside a directory when quota limit is reached
Summary: quota: "EDQUOT" for rename of contents inside a directory when quota limit is...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED EOL
Alias: None
Product: GlusterFS
Classification: Community
Component: quota
Version: pre-release
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Susant Kumar Palai
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-12-03 03:45 UTC by Susant Kumar Palai
Modified: 2015-10-22 15:40 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-10-22 15:40:20 UTC
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Susant Kumar Palai 2013-12-03 03:45:14 UTC 
Description of problem:

Presently, we have seen a behaviour where "EDQUOT" is seen when rename of the contents of a directory, given the fact that the quota limit is already reached for that directory.

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. set quota limit on a directory.
2. create data inside that directory will quota limit is not reached
3. rename any file or directory inside that directory.

Actual results:
EDQUOT for rename operation

Expected results:
rename should happen

Additional info:
Comment 1 Anand Avati 2013-12-03 04:12:55 UTC 
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/6399 (quota: "EDQUOT" for renaming files) posted (#1) for review on master by susant palai (spalai)
Comment 2 Anand Avati 2013-12-03 10:24:28 UTC 
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/6399 (quota: "EDQUOT" for renaming files) posted (#2) for review on master by susant palai (spalai)
Comment 3 Anand Avati 2013-12-03 12:41:03 UTC 
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/6399 (quota: "EDQUOT" for renaming files) posted (#3) for review on master by susant palai (spalai)
Comment 4 Anand Avati 2013-12-03 12:43:51 UTC 
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/6399 (quota: "EDQUOT" for renaming files) posted (#4) for review on master by susant palai (spalai)
Comment 5 Anand Avati 2013-12-04 02:49:12 UTC 
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/6399 (quota: "EDQUOT" for renaming files) posted (#5) for review on master by susant palai (spalai)
Comment 6 Anand Avati 2013-12-04 16:46:24 UTC 
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/6399 (quota: "EDQUOT" for renaming files) posted (#6) for review on master by susant palai (spalai)
Comment 7 Anand Avati 2013-12-04 16:53:01 UTC 
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/6399 (quota: "EDQUOT" for renaming files) posted (#7) for review on master by susant palai (spalai)
Comment 8 Anand Avati 2013-12-04 19:11:24 UTC 
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/6399 (quota: "EDQUOT" for renaming files) posted (#8) for review on master by susant palai (spalai)
Comment 9 Anand Avati 2013-12-06 04:19:47 UTC 
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/6399 (quota: "EDQUOT" for renaming files) posted (#9) for review on master by susant palai (spalai)
Comment 10 Anand Avati 2013-12-06 04:27:18 UTC 
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/6399 (quota: "EDQUOT" for renaming files) posted (#10) for review on master by susant palai (spalai)
Comment 11 Anand Avati 2013-12-11 08:31:21 UTC 
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/6399 (quota: "EDQUOT" for renaming files) posted (#11) for review on master by susant palai (spalai)
Comment 12 Anand Avati 2013-12-15 16:57:40 UTC 
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/6399 (quota: "EDQUOT" for renaming files) posted (#12) for review on master by susant palai (spalai)
Comment 13 Anand Avati 2013-12-15 17:09:58 UTC 
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/6399 (quota: "EDQUOT" for renaming files) posted (#13) for review on master by susant palai (spalai)
Comment 14 Kaleb KEITHLEY 2015-10-22 15:40:20 UTC 
pre-release version is ambiguous and about to be removed as a choice.

If you believe this is still a bug, please change the status back to NEW and choose the appropriate, applicable version for it.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.