Bug 1037609 - libspiro is out of date
Summary: libspiro is out of date
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: libspiro
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kevin Fenzi
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-12-03 13:28 UTC by H.J. Lu
Modified: 2013-12-05 04:34 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-12-03 23:48:27 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description H.J. Lu 2013-12-03 13:28:09 UTC
libspiro seems to have moved to

https://github.com/fontforge/libspiro

Comment 1 Kevin Fenzi 2013-12-03 23:48:27 UTC
Updated in rawhide. Thanks.

Comment 2 Christopher Meng 2013-12-04 10:17:02 UTC
Thanks for your notification, I just changed libuninameslist's tag name strategy on github, also for libspiro.

Kevin, this should be verisoned like: 0.2.20130930, but not 20130930.

Comment 3 Kevin Fenzi 2013-12-04 16:11:50 UTC
I saw that they added a useless 0.2 there. I suppose we could reversion, but it will require us to use Epoch. 

Probibly we want to talk to upstream and see if how they are going to be doing versioning moving forward. I'm not sure what value the 0.2 adds there.

Comment 4 Christopher Meng 2013-12-05 04:34:29 UTC
(In reply to Kevin Fenzi from comment #3)
> I saw that they added a useless 0.2 there. I suppose we could reversion, but
> it will require us to use Epoch. 

Yes, I should told you about this more quickly... Then we can untag it... Inevitably, we are too late. ;)

> Probibly we want to talk to upstream and see if how they are going to be
> doing versioning moving forward. I'm not sure what value the 0.2 adds there.

Talk to me is OK ;)

I've dicussed with others to use majorver.minorver.date as release naming way. We don't have intention to change again from now on.

Just keep this versioned packaged there.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.