Bug 1037967 - Packaging issues
Summary: Packaging issues
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: aunit
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Pavel Zhukov
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-12-04 07:29 UTC by Michael Schwendt
Modified: 2014-06-18 07:22 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-12-04 14:19:23 UTC
Type: Bug


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Michael Schwendt 2013-12-04 07:29:05 UTC
Bug 1001249 has been closed without responding to the comment there, so:

[...]

No files are duplicated anymore, but are they placed correctly?

* Now the base package contains the .html/.info/.pdf/.txt developer docs, and the -devel package the license COPYING and README.

* The license file belongs into the base package (and the -devel package depends on that one):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Subpackage_Licensing

* "License" tag claims "GPLv2+", but file COPYING is GPLv3, and source files contain a GPLv3 "or later" preamble.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#.22or_later_version.22_licenses

* The README refers to the docs, which are in a different package.

* There's an empty /usr/share/aunit and /usr/share/aunit/examples directory.

* %defattr(...) is superfluous even for RHEL5.

Comment 1 Pavel Zhukov 2013-12-04 07:45:51 UTC
Any reasons to create new bugreport and reopen old one?

Comment 2 Michael Schwendt 2013-12-04 07:50:24 UTC
It's an accident only. Responding to my comment would have been nice.

Comment 3 Pavel Zhukov 2013-12-04 14:19:23 UTC
All fixed. 
Thank you for review.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.