Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1038379

Summary: be2net module does not give any hint when set num_vfs with out of range number(Emulex card)
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Jun Li <juli>
Component: qemu-kvmAssignee: Bandan Das <bdas>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 7.0CC: acathrow, alex.williamson, chayang, hhuang, juli, juzhang, michen, sluo, virt-maint, xfu
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-02-12 09:00:11 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jun Li 2013-12-05 02:25:37 UTC
Description of problem:
be2net module did not give any hint when set num_vfs with out of range number.
Such as:
# lspci -vvv -s 09:00.0 | grep 'Initial VFs'
		Initial VFs: 16, Total VFs: 16, Number of VFs: 0, Function Dependency Link: 00
----
So set num_vfs with 100, be2net module did not give any hint and return with success.
# modprobe -r be2net; modprobe be2net num_vfs=100
----
BTW, set num_vfs with -1, kernel will give an ERROR message. 
# modprobe -r be2net; modprobe be2net num_vfs=-1
modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'be2net': Invalid argument

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
3.10.0-57.el7.x86_64
qemu-kvm-rhev-1.5.3-20.el7.x86_64

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:
be2net module did not give any hint.

Expected results:
be2net module will give a friendly hint.

Additional info:

Comment 4 Bandan Das 2014-02-06 11:22:14 UTC
The be2net driver behaves differently than say, for example ixgbe when it comes to trying to create more VFs than is possible.

static int be_vf_setup(struct be_adapter *adapter)
{
...
	} else {
		if (num_vfs > be_max_vfs(adapter))
			dev_info(dev, "Device supports %d VFs and not %d\n",
				 be_max_vfs(adapter), num_vfs);
		adapter->num_vfs = min_t(u16, num_vfs, be_max_vfs(adapter));
		if (!adapter->num_vfs)
			return 0;
	}

It presents a message about how many VFs can be created and also goes forward with creating the maximum possible. I see nothing wrong with that approach, except for probably a better wording of the dev_info message that we are going ahead and creating VFs anyway.

In the logs, we have -
be2net 0000:09:00.1: Device supports 16 VFs and not 100

and lspci confirms 16 VFs have been created.

Comment 8 Bandan Das 2014-02-12 09:00:11 UTC
Closing as per comment 4