Bug 1038597 - bundle deploy to platform resource fails
Summary: bundle deploy to platform resource fails
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1060223
Alias: None
Product: JBoss Operations Network
Classification: JBoss
Component: Provisioning
Version: JON 3.2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: JON 3.2.1
Assignee: RHQ Project Maintainer
QA Contact: Mike Foley
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-12-05 12:57 UTC by Armine Hovsepyan
Modified: 2015-09-03 00:02 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-02-17 23:08:44 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
server.log (98.41 KB, text/x-log)
2013-12-05 13:03 UTC, Armine Hovsepyan 		no flags Details
server_nonHA.log (384.27 KB, text/x-log)
2013-12-05 13:05 UTC, Armine Hovsepyan 		no flags Details
View All

Comment 1 Armine Hovsepyan 2013-12-05 13:01:18 UTC 
Description of problem:
bundle deploy to platform resource fails 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
jon 3.2 CR1

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install bundle on a group containing only jon plugin resource
2.
3.

Actual results:
deployment failes


Expected results:
deployment goes correctly as with other resources


Additional info:
attached server.log for HA and non-HA environments
Comment 2 Armine Hovsepyan 2013-12-05 13:03:13 UTC 
Created attachment 833137 [details]
server.log
Comment 3 Armine Hovsepyan 2013-12-05 13:05:56 UTC 
Created attachment 833139 [details]
server_nonHA.log
Comment 6 Larry O'Leary 2014-02-14 16:24:35 UTC 
This sounds bad. It may be related to bug 1060223. We need to verify and address accordingly.
Comment 9 Jay Shaughnessy 2014-02-14 22:09:02 UTC 
I think this is a duplicate of Bug 1060223.  Which means that it's not limited to, but more prevalent on, oracle.
Comment 10 Larry O'Leary 2014-02-14 22:12:02 UTC 
That is what I was thinking too.

I just haven't been able to reproduce it in the same manner and the introduction of HA seems to indicate that the problem is different. However, perhaps HA just makes it more likely? A timing issue?
Comment 14 Larry O'Leary 2014-02-17 23:08:44 UTC 
Bug 1060223 was captured with more details then this bug so I am closing this one as a duplicate.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1060223 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.