Hide Forgot
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1038638 +++ Description of problem: See upstream bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo/+bug/1251757 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: --- Additional comment from RHEL Product and Program Management on 2013-12-05 09:45:05 EST --- Since this issue was entered in bugzilla, the release flag has been set to ? to ensure that it is properly evaluated for this release. --- Additional comment from Dave Allan on 2013-12-05 10:12:09 EST --- Checking into risk of fix; may want to take for 4.0GA --- Additional comment from Perry Myers on 2013-12-05 11:29:29 EST --- This seems important enough to be an RC blocker for 4.0. But doesn't this bug need to be cloned to Nova, Ceilometer, Neutron, etc (every component that copies and pastes the code from Oslo for RPC?)
Verified the bug against qpid-cpp-server-0.18-14.el6. After 'service qpidd restart', the following subsriptions are renewed by testing server (snippet from qpidd trace=yes feature): Dec 17 17:55:27 rhel65 qpidd[8242]: 2013-12-17 17:55:27 [Broker] info Queue "my-topic": Policy created: type=reject; maxCount=0; maxSize=104857600 Dec 17 17:55:27 rhel65 qpidd[8242]: 2013-12-17 17:55:27 [Broker] info Queue "5345635b-19c6-4186-92e2-bf2d997b7264:0.1": Policy created: type=reject; maxCount=0; maxSize=104857600 Dec 17 17:55:27 rhel65 qpidd[8242]: 2013-12-17 17:55:27 [Broker] info Queue "my-topic.server-02": Policy created: type=reject; maxCount=0; maxSize=104857600 I guess this means the bug is fixed. But I'm not sure whether this is enough to verify this specific bug which is opened for openstack-neutron package, not just oslo. Ofer, again, can you elaborate on whether the check I've done is enough to verify the bug?
As per Livnat's suggestion, marking the bug as verified.
We can use the following testing utilities to create fanout exchanges: https://github.com/kgiusti/oslo-messaging-clients
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2013-1859.html