Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Description of problem:
On the initial setup section, where the user has to accept the License Agreement, there's a header that says "LOCALIZATION", with only the LICENSE INFORMATION spoke underneath. With just the one option, I'm not sure that the Localization header should be there. Accepting a License Agreement doesn't feel like it falls under a Localization task to me.
Perhaps we should consider renaming it if we can, or removing it entirely?
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
initial-setup-0.3.9.5-1.el7
Additional info:
What about LICENSING ?
I guess we need to keep the section header, both due to commonality with Anaconda and as there might additional spokes provided be addons in the future.
Comment 7Alexander Todorov
2014-11-11 11:56:06 UTC
There's no licensing spoke anymore. At the end of the installation (before reboot) there's a yellow footer note saying "Usage of this product is subject to the licensing found in /usr/share/.../EULA" (sorry didn't see the exact text as it flashed quickly).
Moving to VERIFIED.
Hi Alex,
this bug is not for anaconda, but for initial-setup. Moving back to ON_QA
Comment 9Alexander Todorov
2014-11-12 08:26:11 UTC
(In reply to Martin Banas from comment #8)
> Hi Alex,
> this bug is not for anaconda, but for initial-setup. Moving back to ON_QA
There's no licensing screen in initial-setup either and as far as I can tell the image from comment #1 is taken during stage2 of the installation process. I don't see any such screen at present.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0407.html