Hide Forgot
Description of problem: On the initial setup section, where the user has to accept the License Agreement, there's a header that says "LOCALIZATION", with only the LICENSE INFORMATION spoke underneath. With just the one option, I'm not sure that the Localization header should be there. Accepting a License Agreement doesn't feel like it falls under a Localization task to me. Perhaps we should consider renaming it if we can, or removing it entirely? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): initial-setup-0.3.9.5-1.el7 Additional info:
Created attachment 834443 [details] Localization header
Máirín, any idea how to name the category while keeping in general at least a bit to cover multiple potential spokes (from e.g. addons)?
*** Bug 1062149 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
What about LICENSING ? I guess we need to keep the section header, both due to commonality with Anaconda and as there might additional spokes provided be addons in the future.
There's no licensing spoke anymore. At the end of the installation (before reboot) there's a yellow footer note saying "Usage of this product is subject to the licensing found in /usr/share/.../EULA" (sorry didn't see the exact text as it flashed quickly). Moving to VERIFIED.
Hi Alex, this bug is not for anaconda, but for initial-setup. Moving back to ON_QA
(In reply to Martin Banas from comment #8) > Hi Alex, > this bug is not for anaconda, but for initial-setup. Moving back to ON_QA There's no licensing screen in initial-setup either and as far as I can tell the image from comment #1 is taken during stage2 of the installation process. I don't see any such screen at present.
Created attachment 956657 [details] initial-setup screen with correct category Verified on: RHEL-7.1-20141111.0: initial-setup-gui-0.3.9.20-1.el7
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0407.html