Bug 1039744 - 4.6. Installation Utility
Summary: 4.6. Installation Utility
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: OpenShift Container Platform
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Documentation
Version: 2.0.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: brice
QA Contact: ecs-bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-12-09 21:49 UTC by Luke Meyer
Modified: 2015-07-20 00:23 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-01-06 05:02:58 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Luke Meyer 2013-12-09 21:49:07 UTC
A few things have changed since this was written.


---
    --create-config              Use with "-c" to create and use a new alternate config file.
==> This went away - it's redundant.



---
Alternatively, additional options can be passed to the utility by including them in a quoted string:
$ sh <(curl -s https://install.openshift.com/ose/) "-e -s rhsm -u user"
==> No need to quote, and -e is redundant with /ose/ in the URL
===
Alternatively, additional options can be passed to the utility by including them after the curl command:
$ sh <(curl -s https://install.openshift.com/ose/) -s rhsm -u user



A further alternative to mention, though I'm not sure where - you can download it from https://install.openshift.com/portable/oo-install-ose.zip and unzip so that it's running locally rather than downloaded. Enterprise users will probably not be happy with running something directly off the internet.

Comment 3 brice 2013-12-10 06:45:40 UTC
1. commented out the --create-config option

2. made suggested changes

3. Added another <para> with:

"A further alternative is to run the  https://install.openshift.com/portable/oo-install-ose.zip directly from the Internet rather than downloading it."


Luke, any suggestions? Not sure if you meant the entirety of the -c option should've been removed (I couldn't find a way to test the install utility; wouldn't work on my 2.0 test instance), and if the wording of number 3. is exactly the right sentiment.

Thanks.

Comment 5 Luke Meyer 2013-12-17 14:05:48 UTC
This plus changes from 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041545 looks fine, thanks!

Comment 6 brice 2013-12-18 01:09:13 UTC
Thanks, Luke!

As far as this BZ goes, everything is ok. More changes are being looked at in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041545 , but it should be ok to put this one onto QA.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.