Hide Forgot
Cloned from launchpad blueprint https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/options-in-groups. Description: At the moment the documentation team hand assigns descriptive groups to each of our options. This is painful and error prone. Instead, we should move all of our options to groups (with deprecated groups or default where it makes sense), and then make sure those groups have descriptions. The docs team can then hook off of that to generate their configuration documentation. I think the first step is to add a hacking check to warn of options not in a group. Specification URL (additional information): None
Moving to openstack-nova for QE in Icehouse cycle.
Moving to POST based on upstream status (Implemented).
Created attachment 883220 [details] ice-house nova.conf
Created attachment 883221 [details] havana nova.conf
ran regression on the latest openstack release and found it to be working fine. # rpm -qa |grep openstack-nova openstack-nova-compute-2014.1-3.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-common-2014.1-3.el7ost.noarch
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-0853.html