Bug 1042540 - [RFE][neutron]: FWaas extension for customized service and service group
Summary: [RFE][neutron]: FWaas extension for customized service and service group
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: openstack-neutron
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: ---
: 8.0 (Liberty)
Assignee: lpeer
QA Contact: Ofer Blaut
URL: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neut...
Whiteboard: upstream_milestone_none upstream_stat...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-12-13 00:18 UTC by RHOS Integration
Modified: 2016-04-26 23:32 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-03-19 11:07:59 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description RHOS Integration 2013-12-13 00:18:18 UTC
Cloned from launchpad blueprint https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/fwaas-customized-service.

Description:

Service is used to define type of traffic, this blueprint creates an extension that allows administrator to create customized service objects. The customized service objects can be grouped together to form a service group object.
A service object can have following attributes:
 Name
 Transport protocol
 Source and destination port numbers (ranges) for services using TCP or UDP
 The ICMP type and code for the services using ICMP
 Service Timeout value

The transport protocol and port numbers are mandatory.

People are asking about the relationship between the service object and the protocol/port that can be defined on the rule. I think service object can cover the current "on-rule" protocol/port. But just for the users who want to create a simple rule, I'm thinking still to keep the original "on-rule" protocol/port options. But we will not allow user to use service object and "on-rule" protocol/port at the same time.

Specification URL (additional information):

None

Comment 2 Nir Yechiel 2015-03-19 11:07:59 UTC
This RFE was automatically opened to track status of upstream development. At this point we see no reason to keep track of this in Red Hat bugzilla, thus closing it.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.