Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Description of problem:
When using acl's, the effective rights mask is incorrectly calculated for the file owner.
An example is the following:
getfacl test
# file: test
# owner: USERNAME
# group: GROUPNAME
user::rw-
user:USERNAME:rwx #effective:r--
group::r--
mask::r--
other::r--
Notice that the effective rights as determined by the mask state r--, while the user has rwx. Attempting to write or execute the file results in a successful operation.
If the acl line is the file owner, the effective calculation should not be displayed, as this provides a false description of the state of the permissions applying to that user.
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
touch test
setfacl -m u:USERNAME:rwx test
setfacl -m m::r test
(In reply to William Brown from comment #0)
> user::rw-
This ^^^ ACL entry takes precedence when the file is accessed by the owner.
> user:USERNAME:rwx #effective:r--
The effective rights is just the rights of the particular ACL entry masked by the effective rights mask. It does not mean that it will take any effect in the end.
> Notice that the effective rights as determined by the mask state r--, while
> the user has rwx. Attempting to write or execute the file results in a
> successful operation.
>
> If the acl line is the file owner, the effective calculation should not be
> displayed, as this provides a false description of the state of the
> permissions applying to that user.
Then you are looking for the ACL entry 'user::rw-' instead of the one for a named user. Please consult the ACCESS CHECK ALGORITHM section of the acl(5) man page.