Bug 1043339 - Show warning for JDBC drivers as modules with no driver
Summary: Show warning for JDBC drivers as modules with no driver
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6
Classification: JBoss
Component: JCA
Version: 6.2.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: James Livingston
QA Contact: Martin Simka
Russell Dickenson
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-12-16 03:21 UTC by James Livingston
Modified: 2018-12-03 20:57 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-02-03 03:54:39 UTC
Type: Enhancement
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker WFLY-2655 0 Major Resolved Show warning for JDBC drivers as modules with no driver 2016-02-03 03:50:48 UTC

Description James Livingston 2013-12-16 03:21:20 UTC
If a <driver> if configured with no <driver-class>, it will attempt to locate the driver(s) via the service loader which should find all JDBC4-compliant drivers.

When you install a non JDBC4-complicant driver as a module and no <driver-class>, the driver will not be installed. That is expected but emitting a warning that no-drivers could be found in the module would be useful to help users troubleshoot the problem.

Comment 1 JBoss JIRA Server 2014-03-18 00:37:42 UTC
Jeff Zhang <jizhang> updated the status of jira WFLY-2655 to Resolved

Comment 2 James Livingston 2014-03-21 00:59:12 UTC
Should be easy to backport https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/commit/fdb6afe7b93ec6fff0ee599e7309d8b682272b18

Comment 4 James Livingston 2014-03-31 05:34:33 UTC
https://github.com/doctau/jboss-eap/tree/bz1043339 now includes renumbering which has been done upstream. I'm checking with Stefano that it's fine to change in EAP too.

Comment 5 tom.jenkinson 2014-09-03 09:34:54 UTC
Hi,

I am checking the status of this, is the work still required or can the bug be closed?

Tom

Comment 6 James Livingston 2014-10-27 23:43:44 UTC
I'm fine if we NACK this for 6.4, although useful in some circumstance there's not a big demand for it.

Comment 7 James Livingston 2016-02-03 03:54:39 UTC
Since this didn't get in to 6.4, and it's an enhancement it's unlikely to be done in a CP, so I'm closing it WONTFIX.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.