Bug 1045264 - missing record class "IN" before the lookup type
Summary: missing record class "IN" before the lookup type
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: OpenShift Container Platform
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Documentation
Version: 2.0.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: brice
QA Contact: ecs-bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-12-20 03:36 UTC by Brenton Leanhardt
Modified: 2017-03-08 17:38 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1045597 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-02-19 23:14:17 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Brenton Leanhardt 2013-12-20 03:36:43 UTC 
Description of problem:

In https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/OpenShift_Enterprise/2/html/Deployment_Guide/Configuring_Sub-domain_Hostname_Resolution.html as well as OpenShift Enterprise's openshift.sh the "IN" record class is missing.

Bind apparently defaults to using the "IN" class since it is the only class used on the internet.  However, to avoid confusion we should follow best practices.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.