Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 1045346 - Cannot attach boundary event to Ad-Hoc Subprocess
Cannot attach boundary event to Ad-Hoc Subprocess
Status: VERIFIED
Product: JBoss BPMS Platform 6
Classification: Retired
Component: jBPM Designer (Show other bugs)
6.0.0
Unspecified Unspecified
high Severity medium
: DR2
: 6.1.0
Assigned To: Tihomir Surdilovic
Kirill Gaevskii
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-12-20 03:42 EST by Tomas Livora
Modified: 2018-01-30 23:33 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Known Issue
Doc Text:
Cause: Consequence: User cannot add a boundary event to an ad-hoc subprocess. Workaround (if any): An embedded subprocess can be used instead of an ad-hoc subprocess to simulate the expected behaviour. Result: If a user tries to add a boundary event to an ad-hoc subprocess the event is added as an intermediate event inside the subprocess.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Tomas Livora 2013-12-20 03:42:41 EST
Description of problem:
It is not possible to add a boundary event to an ad-hoc subprocess.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ER6

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a new business process and add an Ad-Hoc subprocess to the canvas.
2. Try to attach a new catching event to the subprocess.

Actual results:
It is only possible to add it inside the subprocess as an intermediate event.

Expected results:
There should be a green border around the subprocess signalizing you can create a boundary event. (This is how it behaves when you want to add a boudary event to an embedded subprocess.)
Comment 1 Tihomir Surdilovic 2014-07-10 11:07:25 EDT
fixed in designer master and 6.1.x branches
Comment 2 Tomas Livora 2014-09-29 05:44:32 EDT
Verified on BPMS 6.1.0 DR3

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.