Bug 1050968 - [RFE] oscap-anaconda-addon: Use services of gtk.RecentManager to store the recent SCAP content URIs
Summary: [RFE] oscap-anaconda-addon: Use services of gtk.RecentManager to store the re...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CANTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: oscap-anaconda-addon
Version: 20
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Vratislav Podzimek
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-01-09 12:51 UTC by Jan Lieskovsky
Modified: 2014-01-09 15:50 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-01-09 14:36:26 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jan Lieskovsky 2014-01-09 12:51:10 UTC
Description of problem:

oscap-anaconda-addon allows to confine final installed Fedora instance via remotely retrieved SCAP content. The SCAP content can be specified via HTTP or HTTPS protocols.

It would be a nice feature to have if the Gtk.Entry holding the remote SCAP content URI could utilize the services of gtk.RecentManager to for automated completion / selection one entry from the list of previously used / entered ones.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
oscap-anaconda-addon-0.3-1.fc20

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Try to install Fedora install image equipped with oscap-anaconda-addon
2. Enter some remote SCAP content URL
3. Abort the installation, retry again (with same boot image)

Actual results:
Previously used SCAP content URL is not suggested / auto-completed.

Expected results:
Previously used SCAP content URL is automatically suggested / completed.

Additional info:
Actually not sure this would be implementable (if Anaconda install iso process isn't in some way exceptional wrt to other standalone running Gtk applications).

But if it's possible, it would be nice to have it.

Comment 1 Vratislav Podzimek 2014-01-09 14:36:26 UTC
There is no writable space the addon could use to write out such URIs.

Comment 2 Jan Lieskovsky 2014-01-09 15:50:22 UTC
(In reply to Vratislav Podzimek from comment #1)
> There is no writable space the addon could use to write out such URIs.

That's what I was afraid of when mentioning not sure if this would be implementable. Nevermind, thanks for checking this.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.